IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
* * * *
IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENDMENT
OF SDCL 15-6-36(a) RULE 06-31
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A hearing was held on February 16, 2006, at Pierre, South Dakota, relating to the
amendment of SDCL 15-6-36(a), and the Court having considered the proposed amendment, the
correspondence and oral presentations relating thereto and being fully advised in the premises,
now, therefore, it is
ORDERED that SDCL 15-6-36(a) be and it is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:
15-6-36(a).
Request for admission.
A party may serve upon any other party a written
request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters
within the scope of § 15-6-26(b) subdivision 15-6-26(b)(1) set forth in the request that relate to
statements or opinions of facts fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness
of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request
unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The
request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action
and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party.
Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is
admitted unless, within thirty days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time
as the court may allow
or as the parties may agree to in writing, the party to whom the request is
directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed
to the matter, signed by the party or by
his the party's attorney, but, unless the court shortens the
time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of
forty-five days after service of the summons and complaint upon him. If objection is made, the
reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail
the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall
fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party
qualify
his an answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested,
he the
party shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party
may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless
he
the party states that
he the party has made a reasonable inquiry and that the information known or
readily obtainable by
him the party is insufficient to enable
him the party to admit or deny. A party
who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for
trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request;
he the party may, subject to provisions
of § 15-6-37(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why
he the party cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the
answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that
an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements
of this rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served.
The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at
a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. The provisions of subdivision 15-6-
37(a)(4) apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this rule shall become effective July 1, 2006.
DATED at Pierre, South Dakota, this 17th day of March 2006.