State of South Dakota
|
EIGHTY-EIGHTH SESSION LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 2013 |
400U0343 | HOUSE BILL NO. 1022 |
Introduced by: The Committee on Health and Human Services at the request of the
Department of Human Services
|
new buildings or renovations will not be considered for approval.
Section 8. That ARSD 46:14:04:01 be repealed.
46:14:04:01. Financial administration for funded projects. All projects or services funded
from moneys under the state plan shall provide fiscal data to the department on forms furnished
by the department. Such fiscal data shall include an accounting of local, county, state, and
federal funds expended for personnel, equipment, consumable supplies, staff travel, consultant
services, alterations and renovations, expenditures from prior reporting periods, cumulative
expenditures to date, cumulative funds received to date, unexpended balances, unliquidated
obligations, and unobligated balances.
Section 9. That ARSD 46:14:05:01 be repealed.
46:14:05:01. Project review requirements and criteria. Project applications for the granting
of funds allocated by the state plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Council on Developmental
Disabilities, the council's executive committee, or the council's staff. The review should include
a determination of the applicability of each of the following criteria and an evaluation of the
degree to which the proposed project meets each applicable criterion:
(1) If the proposed project significantly involves agencies other than the applicant, the
application shall include letters from all such agencies. These letters of support shall include
statements specifying the resources to be committed to the project by each agency and the
responsibilities of each agency in implementing the project;
(2) Projects which are less than statewide in their scope must be adaptable to other parts of
the state of similar nature and characteristics;
(3) Projects which establish an ongoing service-providing resource must be able to continue
independently upon termination of grant funds;
(4) Projects which provide or initiate the provision of direct services to clients shall describe
the characteristics of the proposed clients, the degree to which the proposed project will serve
developmentally disabled people, and the characteristics of the project's developmentally
disabled clients;
(5) Applications shall clearly specify the project's progress and outcomes; and
(6) Proposed projects shall relate directly to one or more of the goals established by the
Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities in their annual state plan. Applications shall
specify the goal or goals to which the proposed project relates. Proposed projects shall be
compared only to other proposals which relate to the same goals.
The Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities, its executive committee, or its staff
shall rate each application in terms of the applicable criteria using the following scale:
(a) Applications greatly exceeding the criterion will receive a rating of 4;
(b) Applications exceeding the criterion will receive a rating of 3;
(c) Application meeting the criterion will receive a rating of 2;
(d) Applications not sufficiently meeting the criterion will receive a rating of 1;
(e) Application not meeting the criterion will receive a rating of 0.
An overall rating for the project shall be calculated by adding the ratings of all applicable
criteria and of all raters, then dividing this sum by the product of the number of applicable
criteria by the number of raters by four. The resultant proportion shall be used as a determining
factor in the selection of applications.