The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Secretary of the
Senate has had under consideration the Senate Journal of the twenty-first day.
All errors, typographical or otherwise, are duly marked in the temporary journal for
correction.
And we hereby move the adoption of the report.
"Section 1. The secretary of the Department of Education and Cultural Affairs shall
promulgate rules, pursuant to chapter 1-26, that calculate exclusions for revenue received from
opting out of the property tax limitations such that all expenditures shall be credited to formula
revenue and unreserved general fund balance from the preceding fiscal year prior to any credits
against opt-out revenue."
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Appropriations respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB
3,
112,
138,
153, and
159 which were deferred to the 36th Legislative Day.
"Section 1. A county or municipality may provide fire service or enter into an agreement for
the provision of fire service. Any county or municipality may appropriate funds for fire services
and may enter into an agreement with any other governmental subdivision or with any nonprofit
fire protection corporation or association legally organized for fire services to furnish funds for
fire suppression purposes on an annual basis as may mutually be agreed upon. The funds shall
be paid to the political subdivision or nonprofit when a claim has been duly filed, audited, and
allowed by the county or municipality.
Section 2. If any county, municipality, or other fire department makes a fire suppression call,
the governing body, may at its discretion, bill the property owner of record for the cost of
answering the fire suppression call. The governing body shall pass a resolution by a two-thirds
vote to bill the property owner. The resolution shall state the owner of record, the legal
description, the date of the fire suppressant call, and the cost to be charged to the property owner
for the fire suppressant call. The resolution shall be sent by certified mail to the owner of record.
If not paid within thirty days from receipt of resolution, the bill for the fire suppressant call may
be filed as a lien on the property.
Section 3. No lien as provided in this Act shall be effective, however, unless a certified
written notice containing the name of the owner of record and legal description of the property
receiving a fire suppressant service, the date the service was rendered, and the name of the
person or persons alleged to be responsible for payment for the services is filed in the office of
the register of deeds of the county in which the person receiving the services resides, or in the
county of the person's residence or last residence if the person is deceased.
Section 4. If any person receiving fire suppressant service is a married person, the lien
therein established shall also be a lien upon all the property, real and personal including joint
tenancy and homestead interests, property thereafter acquired, or interest in property, of the
husband or wife of such person receiving fire suppressant service as the case may be. The lien
does not sever a joint tenancy, nor affect the right of survivorship except that the lien is
enforceable to the extent that the person receiving fire suppressant service had an interest prior
to the person's death.
Section 5. Any lien established by virtue of this Act may be foreclosed by action or
compromised and settled in the manner prescribed by chapter 28-14, relating to public aid to
poor liens."
The Committee on Taxation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1219 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Taxation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB
4
which was deferred to the 36th Legislative Day.
"Section 3. That chapter
34-6
be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
use, distribution, marketing, promotion, and sale of tobacco products that are more restrictive
than those provided for by the Legislature."
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 156 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
"Section 1. That
§
47-9A-1
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-1.
The Legislature of the State of South Dakota recognizes the importance of the
family farm to the economic and moral stability of the state, and the Legislature recognizes that
the existence of the
independent
family farm is
threatened by conglomerates
important to the
economic viability of rural South Dakota and is jeopardized by downward vertical integration
in farming. Therefore, it is hereby declared to be the public policy of this state, and shall be the
provision of this chapter, that, notwithstanding the provisions of
§
47-2-3, no foreign or
domestic
corporation
legal entity which limits the individual liability of its owners or investors
,
except as provided herein, shall be formed or licensed under the
South Dakota Business
Corporation Act
laws of this state
for the purpose of owning, leasing, holding, or otherwise
controlling agricultural land
to be used in the business of agriculture
or owning livestock
.
Section 2. That
§
47-9A-2
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-2.
Terms used in this chapter
, unless the context otherwise plainly requires,
mean:
distributor of farm products or supplies provides spraying, harvesting or other farm
services;
, or the ownership of livestock; and
47-9A-3.
Except as provided
herein
in this chapter
, no foreign or domestic corporation may
own livestock for more than two weeks prior to delivery for slaughter or
engage in farming; nor
may any foreign or domestic corporation, directly or indirectly, own, acquire, or otherwise
obtain an interest, whether legal, beneficial, or otherwise, in any title to
real estate used for
farming or capable of being used for farming
agricultural land
in this state.
Section 4. That
§
47-9A-3.1
be repealed.
47-9A-3.1.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 do not apply to the cultivation of edible fruits,
vegetables, or mushrooms if such cultivation occurs within a greenhouse or other enclosed or
semi-enclosed structure.
Section 5. That
§
47-9A-4
be repealed.
47-9A-4.
Any national or state chartered bank, or trust company, authorized to do business
in this state shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter; provided, however, that no
national or state bank or trust company shall purchase agricultural lands in South Dakota
through a pooled investment fund formed from assets from retirement, pension, profit sharing,
stock bonds, or other trusts.
Section 6. That
§
47-9A-5
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-5.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 shall
§
§
47-9A-1 and 47-9A-3 do
not apply to
agricultural land
and land capable of being used for farming
or livestock
which:
by qualified persons who own agricultural land or an interest in a farming operation.
For purposes of this exception a qualified person may be either a natural person or
an entity which meets the requirements of exception number one of this section;
47-9A-6.
The restrictions provided in
§
47-9A-3 shall not apply to a bona fide encumbrance
taken for purposes of security.
Section 8. That
§
47-9A-7
be repealed.
47-9A-7.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 shall not apply to agricultural lands acquired by a
corporation by process of law in the collection of debts; or by any procedure for the enforcement
of a lien or claim thereon, whether created by mortgage or otherwise; provided, however, that
all lands so acquired be disposed of within ten years after acquiring the title thereto, and further
provided that the land so acquired shall not be used for farming during the ten-year period
except under a lease to a family farm unit, a family farm corporation, or an authorized farm
corporation. The aforementioned ten-year limitation period shall be deemed a covenant running
with the title to the land against any corporate grantee or assignee or the successor of such
corporation.
Section 9. That
§
47-9A-8
be repealed.
47-9A-8.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 shall not apply to gifts of agricultural lands, either
by grant or devise, to any corporation organized under chapter 47-22.
Section 10. That
§
47-9A-9
be repealed.
47-9A-9.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 shall not apply to a farm operated for research or
experimental purposes; provided, that any commercial sales from such farm shall be incidental
to the research or experimental objectives of the corporation.
Section 11. That
§
47-9A-10
be repealed.
47-9A-10.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 shall not apply to agricultural land operated by a
corporation for the purpose of raising breeding stock for resale to farmers or operated for the
purpose of growing seed, nursery plants, or sod.
Section 12. That
§
47-9A-11
be repealed.
47-9A-11.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 shall not apply to agricultural lands acquired by a
corporation solely for the purpose of feeding livestock.
Section 13. That
§
47-9A-12
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-12.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3
shall
do
not apply to agricultural land acquired by
a corporation other than a family farm corporation or authorized farm corporation for immediate
or potential use in nonfarming purposes. A corporation may hold such agricultural land in such
acreage as may be necessary to its nonfarm business operation; provided, however, that pending
the development of agricultural land for nonfarm purposes, such land may not be used for
farming except under lease to a family farm unit, a family farm corporation or an authorized
farm corporation, or except when controlled through ownership, options, leaseholds or other
agreements by
a corporation which has entered into an agreement with the United States of
America pursuant to the New Community Act of 1968, (Title IV of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 3901-3914), as amended, or a subsidiary or assign of such
a corporation.
Section 14. That
§
47-9A-13
be repealed.
47-9A-13.
The restrictions of
§
47-9A-3 shall not apply to a family farm corporation or an
authorized farm corporation.
Section 15. That
§
47-9A-13.1
be repealed.
47-9A-13.1.
No corporation, except a family farm corporation, may own or operate any hog
confinement facility. For the purposes of this chapter a hog confinement facility is any real
estate used for the breeding, farrowing, and raising of swine. This restriction shall not apply to
the acquisition of a hog confinement facility by a corporation by process of law in the collection
of debts, or by any other procedure for the enforcement of a lien or claim thereon, as provided
in
§
47-9A-7.
Section 16. That
§
47-9A-14
be repealed.
47-9A-14.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise plainly requires, "family
farm corporation" means a corporation founded for the purpose of farming and the ownership
of agricultural land in which the majority of the voting stock is held by the majority of the
stockholders who are members of a family related to each other within the third degree of
kindred, and at least one of whose stockholders is a person who is residing on or actively
operating the farm or who has resided on or has actively operated the farm, and none of whose
stockholders are corporations, or a corporation founded for the purpose of farming and the
ownership of agricultural land in which a majority of the voting stock is held by resident
stockholders who are family farmers and are actively engaged in farming as their primary
economic activity. However, a family farm corporation does not cease to qualify as such
hereunder by reason of any devise or bequest of shares of voting stock or by reason of any gift
of shares of voting stock to any person who is entitled to inherit from the donor if the donor
were to die intestate.
Section 17. That
§
47-9A-15
be repealed.
47-9A-15.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise plainly requires, "authorized
farm corporation" means a corporation whose shareholders do not exceed ten in number, whose
shareholders are all natural persons or estates, whose shares are all of one class, and whose
revenues from rent, royalties, dividends, interest, and annuities do not exceed twenty percent
of its gross receipts.
Section 18. That
§
47-9A-16
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-16.
Every corporation
or limited liability entity
engaged in farming or proposing to
commence farming in this state shall file with the secretary of state a report containing:
47-9A-17.
The report of a corporation seeking to qualify hereunder as a family farm
corporation or an authorized farm corporation shall contain, in addition:
47-9A-18.
No corporation
shall
or limited liability entity may
commence farming in this
state until the secretary of state has inspected the report required by
§
47-9A-16 and certified
that its proposed operations comply with the provisions of
§
§
47-9A-16 and 47-9A-17
§
47-9A-
16
.
Section 21. That
§
47-9A-19
be repealed.
47-9A-19.
Every corporation engaged in farming in this state shall, prior to the first day of
the second month following the anniversary month of the corporation of each year, file with the
secretary of state a report containing the information required in this chapter, based on its
operations in the preceding calendar year and its status at the end of such year.
Section 22. That
§
47-9A-20
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-20.
Any corporation
or limited liability entity
which fails to file any report required
by this chapter or intentionally files false information on any report required by this chapter is
subject to a civil fine of not more than one thousand dollars.
Section 23. That
§
47-9A-21
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-21.
If the attorney general has reason to believe that a corporation
or limited liability
entity
is in violation of this chapter,
he
the attorney general
shall commence an action in the
circuit court for the county in which any agricultural lands relative to such violation are situated,
or if situated in two or more counties, in any county in which a substantial part of the lands are
situated. If the court finds that the lands in question are being held in violation of this chapter,
it shall enter an order so declaring.
Section 24. That
§
47-9A-22
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-22.
The attorney general shall file any order under
§
47-9A-21 for record with the
register of deeds of each county in which any portion of
said
the
lands are located. Thereafter,
the corporation
or limited liability entity
owning such land shall have a period of five years from
the date of such order to divest itself of such lands. The
aforementioned
five-year limitation
period shall be deemed a covenant running with the title to the land against any corporate
grantee or assignee or the successor of such
corporation
entity
. Any lands not so divested within
the time prescribed shall be sold at public sale in the manner prescribed by order of the court.
Section 25. That
§
47-9A-23
be amended to read as follows:
47-9A-23.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Family Farm Act
of 1974
.
Section 26. The provisions of this Act become effective on July 1, 2002, if the electors of
the State of South Dakota approve the repeal of sections 21, 22, 23, and 24 of Article XVII of
the South Dakota Constitution at the June 2002, primary election."
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB
67 which was deferred to the 36th Legislative Day.
MADAM PRESIDENT:
I have the honor to return herewith SCR 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, and 11 in which the House has
concurred.
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
I have the honor to transmit herewith HCR 1013 which has been adopted by the House and
your concurrence is respectfully requested.
I have the honor to transmit herewith HB 1171, 1229, 1237, 1281, and 1289 which have
passed the House and your favorable consideration is respectfully requested.
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
Yesterday, Sen. Sutton (Dan) announced his intention to reconsider the vote by which
SB 152 was lost.
Sen. Sutton moved that the Senate do now reconsider the vote by which SB 152 was lost.
The question being on Sen. Sutton's motion to reconsider the vote by which SB 152 was
lost.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 18, Nays 16, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the motion carried and SB 152 was up for reconsideration and final passage.
Sen. Sutton moved that SB 152 be immediately reconsidered.
Which motion prevailed.
SB 152:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow the offer of an individual health
benefit plan without certain mandates.
Having had its second reading was up for reconsideration and final passage.
Which motion prevailed.
Albers; Apa; Bogue; de Hueck; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Everist; Greenfield;
Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Koskan; Moore; Olson (Ed); Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Vitter
Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; Dennert; Kleven; Koetzle; Madden; McCracken;
McIntyre; Munson; Putnam; Reedy; Symens; Volesky; Whiting
Duxbury
Sen. Apa moved the previous question.
Sen. Everist moved that the reports of the Standing Committees on
Judiciary on SB 155 as found on page 373 of the Senate Journal
; also
Transportation on SB 70 as found on page 373 of the Senate Journal
; also
Transportation on HB 1091 as found on page 376 of the Senate Journal
; also
Agriculture and Natural Resources on SB 179 as found on page 377 of the Senate Journal
;
also
Commerce on SB 81 as found on page 391 of the Senate Journal
; also
Commerce on SB 157 as found on page 393 of the Senate Journal
; also
Commerce on SB 180 as found on page 394 of the Senate Journal
; also
Commerce on SB 103 as found on page 394 of the Senate Journal be adopted.
Which motion prevailed and the reports were adopted.
Commerce on SB 168 as found on page 393 of the Senate Journal
; also
Sen. Koskan requested that HB 1172 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
SB 141:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
authorize total return unitrusts.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 141 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 165:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
require school systems to allow military
recruiters access to students and school facilities.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 165 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Albers; Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert;
Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham;
Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle; Koskan; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson
(Ed); Putnam; Reedy; Staggers; Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Sutton (Dan)
Yeas:
Albers; Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert;
Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham;
Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle; Koskan; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson
(Ed); Putnam; Reedy; Staggers; Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Sutton (Dan)
SB 164:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
require damage disclosure statements for
certain large boats.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall SB 164 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill lost.
SB 83:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
reduce the capitalization rate for determining
nonagricultural acreage.
Was read the second time.
Sen. Everist moved that SB 83 be placed to follow SB 181 on today's calendar.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so placed.
SB 149:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow a school district to impose additional
taxes.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 149 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 22, Nays 12, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 166:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
make an appropriation to the Department
of Education and Cultural Affairs to reimburse fees and provide a stipend for National Board
for Professional Teaching Standards certified teachers.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 166 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 29, Nays 4, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Yeas 10, Nays 24, Excused 1, Absent 0
Albers; Bogue; Brosz; Diedtrich (Elmer); Everist; Koskan; McCracken; Munson; Olson (Ed);
Vitter
Apa; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich (Larry); Drake; Duxbury;
Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle; Madden; McIntyre; Moore; Putnam;
Reedy; Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Volesky; Whiting
Daugaard
Albers; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; de Hueck; Dennert; Everist; Ham; Hutmacher;
Kleven; Koetzle; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy;
Sutton (Dan); Volesky; Whiting
Apa; Bogue; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Greenfield; Hagen; Koskan;
Staggers; Symens; Vitter
Excused:
Daugaard
Albers; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Dennert; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake;
Duxbury; Everist; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle; Koskan; Madden; McCracken;
McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy; Staggers; Symens; Vitter; Volesky;
Whiting
Apa; Bogue; de Hueck; Greenfield
Daugaard; Sutton (Dan)
Which request was supported.
The question being on Sen. Koetzle's motion that SB 181 be further amended.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 12, Nays 21, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
de Hueck; Dennert; Duxbury; Hagen; Hutmacher; Koetzle; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Reedy;
Symens; Volesky
Nays:
Albers; Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer);
Drake; Everist; Greenfield; Ham; Kleven; Koskan; Madden; McCracken; Olson (Ed); Putnam;
Staggers; Vitter; Whiting
Excused:
Daugaard; Sutton (Dan)
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members
present, the President declared the motion lost.
HB 1171:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
adjust the salary schedule for the office
of state's attorney.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Local Government.
HB 1229:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
conduct a pilot study on agricultural
income value, to appropriate money for a pilot study, and to declare an emergency.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
HB 1237:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
amend the General Appropriations Act
for fiscal year 2002.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
HB 1281:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
lengthen the period required for notice
of nonrenewal of certain insurance policies.
HB 1074:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
repeal certain inheritance tax provisions
and to re-enact a provision regarding access to a safe deposit box upon the death of a person
having access.
Was read the second time.
Sen. Duxbury moved that HB 1074 be deferred to Thursday, February 7, the 23rd legislative
day.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so deferred.
HB 1131:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for civil recovery of unpaid
property and services.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1131 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 23, Nays 10, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1138:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
increase the penalty for the stalking of
certain children.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1138 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 32, Nays 1, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1224:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
prohibit interference with the use of
communication devices to summon aid to an emergency.
Was read the second time.
Albers; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Everist;
Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Madden; McCracken; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed);
Putnam; Staggers; Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Apa; Bogue; de Hueck; Dennert; Duxbury; Kleven; Koetzle; Koskan; McIntyre; Reedy
Excused:
Daugaard; Sutton (Dan)
Albers; Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich (Larry);
Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven;
Koetzle; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy;
Staggers; Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Koskan
Daugaard; Sutton (Dan)
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1032 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1033:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide benefit improvements for certain
members of the South Dakota Retirement System, to revise the provisions for the purchase of
uncredited service by members of the system, and to provide for increased contributions for
certain members.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1033 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1034:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
reduce the legal blood alcohol limits for
motor vehicle drivers and boat operators.
Was read the second time.
Sen. Everist moved that HB 1034 be deferred to Thursday, February 7, the 23rd legislative
day.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so deferred.
HB 1065:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
expand the South Dakota Retirement
System board membership.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1065 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 15, Nays 19, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
Albers; Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich (Larry);
Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven;
Koetzle; Koskan; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam;
Reedy; Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Daugaard
Yeas:
Albers; Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich (Larry);
Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven;
Koetzle; Koskan; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam;
Reedy; Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Daugaard
de Hueck; Dennert; Duxbury; Hagen; Hutmacher; Koetzle; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore;
Olson (Ed); Reedy; Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Volesky
Albers; Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer);
Drake; Everist; Greenfield; Ham; Kleven; Koskan; Madden; Munson; Putnam; Vitter; Whiting
Daugaard
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill lost.