The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Secretary of the
Senate has had under consideration the Senate Journal of the twentieth day and finds that the
following correction shall be made:
On page 367, line 8, delete "9" and insert "10", delete "printed" and insert "Senate Local
Government engrossed".
All other errors, typographical or otherwise, are duly marked in the temporary journal for
correction.
And we hereby move the adoption of the report.
"Section 1. That chapter
32-3
be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
nonrepairable, reconstructed, rebuilt, or any other symbol or word of like kind or meaning, or
that it has been damaged by flood, and the name of the state that last issued title.
Section 2. That
§
32-3-1
be amended by adding thereto a NEW SUBDIVISION to read as
follows:
Section 3. That
§
32-3-51.7
be amended to read as follows:
32-3-51.7.
Each certificate of title issued by the department shall
contain the following
phrase: South Dakota state law requires the disclosure of damage on motor vehicles. This
information is available upon written request from the Department of Revenue, Division of
Motor Vehicles. Each certificate of title shall also contain on its front a statement as to whether
previous damage disclosure statements indicate the motor vehicle had been damaged at one time
in excess of three thousand dollars as provided by
carry the word, salvage, on the front if the
disclosure statement indicates that the motor vehicle meets the disclosure requirements of
§
32-
3-51.8.
Section 4. That
§
32-3-51.8
be amended to read as follows:
32-3-51.8.
Upon the sale, transfer, or trade-in of a motor vehicle, or if licensing a motor
vehicle in South Dakota which is titled in another state or jurisdiction, the seller, transferor,
trader, or person wishing to license in South Dakota the motor vehicle which is titled in another
state or jurisdiction shall
submit an accurately completed damage disclosure statement when
applying for a certificate of title pursuant to
§
32-3-18
disclose whether the motor vehicle has
incurred damage requiring disclosure under section 2 of this Act
. The
completed damage
disclosure statement may be on the back of the certificate of title or on a separate document that
has been approved for use by the department. Except as otherwise provided by this section, no
certificate of title may be issued by the department unless the
damage
disclosure statement
accompanies the application. It is a Class 1 misdemeanor to intentionally falsify any information
on the
damage
disclosure statement. No person or dealer is liable to a subsequent owner of a
vehicle because a prior owner of the vehicle failed to disclose that the vehicle had previously
been damaged and repaired. This section does not apply to motor vehicles more than nine model
years old or with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than sixteen thousand pounds and does
not apply if a rebuilt title or junking certificate is sought.
Section 5. That
§
32-3-51.9
be amended to read as follows:
Section 6. That
§
32-3-51.11
be amended to read as follows:
32-3-51.11.
The department shall retain each
damaged
disclosure statement received. The
statement shall become part of the title history available to the public pursuant to
§
32-3-30.2.
Section 7. That
§
32-3-51.14
be amended to read as follows:
32-3-51.14.
The department shall prescribe, pursuant to chapter 1-26, the format for the
damage
disclosure statement provided by
§
32-3-51.8. An area for a
damage
disclosure
statement shall appear on the back of each certificate of title issued by the department. The
department may also approve separate documents on which a
damage
disclosure statement may
be submitted. The
damage
disclosure statement form shall indicate whether the motor vehicle
has been damaged
such that it cost more than three thousand dollars to repair to its predamaged
condition
to the extent of seventy-five percent or more of its retail value as determined by the
National Automobile Dealers' Association Official Used Car Guide in effect at the time the
damage occurred
and
shall indicate
any other damage information the department deems
appropriate. If a separate document from the certificate of title contains the
damage
disclosure
statement, the document shall also require the following information: year, make, model, and
vehicle identification number of the motor vehicle.
Section 8. That
§
32-3-51.15
be amended to read as follows:
32-3-51.15.
The
dollar amount of
damage to a motor vehicle required to be disclosed
pursuant to
§
32-3-51.8 shall include the costs necessary to return the damaged motor vehicle
to its predamaged condition. Such costs include parts, labor, paint, and frame work done on the
damaged motor vehicle.
The amount of damage to a motor vehicle is determined by adding the
retail value of all labor, parts, and material used in repairing the damage.
If the retail value of
labor has not been determined by a purchase in the ordinary course of business (for example,
the labor is performed by the owner of the vehicle), the retail value of the labor is presumed to
be the product of the repair time, as provided in a generally accepted autobody repair flat rate
manual, multiplied by
thirty-five
forty
dollars.
Section 9. That
§
32-3-51.16
be repealed.
32-3-51.16.
The department shall place the damage information pursuant to
§
32-3-51.7 on
the first South Dakota title and all subsequent titles issued for any motor vehicle which came
into the state unrepaired and for which a salvage certificate of title was issued by another state
unless the person applying for the South Dakota title maintains at his place of business proof
that the vehicle did not sustain damage equivalent to the amount set forth in this chapter. The
proof shall include two photographs showing all four sides of the motor vehicle and either an
insurance adjuster's written report or a written repair estimate which details the parts, labor,
paint, and frame work required to repair the motor vehicle.
Section 10. That chapter
32-3
be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
Section 11. That
§
32-3-51.5
be amended to read as follows:
32-3-51.5.
Any motor vehicle, trailer, or semitrailer whose title has been marked
or branded
by another state or jurisdiction
as salvage, unrebuildable, nonrepairable, or any similar term
,
shall receive a
salvage
title
, which shall contain the damage disclosure information as set forth
in
§
§
32-3-51.7 and 32-3-51.8 or, at the option of the owner,
. If the title is branded as parts only,
scrap, or junk, the owner shall receive
a junking certificate.
"
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Transportation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1091 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
"Section 1. Terms used in this Act mean:
Section 3. If either party requests the secretary of agriculture to collect the samples, the cost
shall be divided equally between the parties.
Section 4. If the person holding a patent believes that the crop from which samples are to
be taken may be subject to intentional damage or destruction, the person may seek a protection
order from the circuit court. The protection order may not interrupt or interfere with normal
farming practices, including harvest and tillage.
Section 5. The samples may be taken from a standing crop, from representative standing
plants in the field, or from crops remaining in the field after harvest.
Section 6. The secretary of agriculture may promulgate rules, pursuant to chapter 1-26, to
determine the following sampling protocols:
Sen. Everist moved that the reports of the Standing Committees on
Taxation on SB 83 as found on page 350 of the Senate Journal
; also
Judiciary on SB 141 as found on page 363 of the Senate Journal
; also
State Affairs on SB 181 as found on page 348 of the Senate Journal
; also
Judiciary on HB 1170 as found on page 361 of the Senate Journal
; also
Judiciary on HB 1180 as found on page 362 of the Senate Journal
; also
Judiciary on HB 1189 as found on page 362 of the Senate Journal
; also
Local Government on HB 1222 as found on page 349 of the Senate Journal be adopted.
Which motion prevailed and the reports were adopted.
Sen. Staggers requested that HB 1074 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
SB 136:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow state chartered banks to expand their
investment options to include certain annuities.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 136 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 0, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 140:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain provisions governing trusts.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 140 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 0, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Excused:
SB 142:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow certain trusts to be shareholders in
certain professional organizations.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 142 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 0, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1036:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain dates pertaining to
references to the Internal Revenue Code.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1036 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 0, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Excused:
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher;
Kleven; Koetzle; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy;
Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Albers; Koskan
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher;
Kleven; Koetzle; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy;
Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Albers; Koskan
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher;
Kleven; Koetzle; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy;
Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Albers; Koskan
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher;
Kleven; Koetzle; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy;
Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Albers; Koskan
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 152:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow the offer of an individual health
benefit plan without certain mandates.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being on Sen. Dan Sutton's pending motion to further amend SB 152 as found
on page 337 of the Senate Journal.
Sen. McCracken moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 17, Nays 17, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
The Senators being equally divided the President voted "Nay."
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill lost.
Sen. Sutton (Dan) announced his intention to reconsider the vote by which SB 152 was
lost.
Sen. Everist moved that SB 182 be placed to follow SB 130 on today's calendar.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so placed.
The question being "Shall SB 152 pass as amended?"
Apa; Bogue; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Greenfield; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven;
Koskan; Moore; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy; Staggers; Sutton (Dan); Symens
Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Duxbury; Everist; Hagen;
Koetzle; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Munson; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Albers
"Section 2. That
§
40-36-1
be amended to read as follows:
The question being "Shall SB 130 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 29, Nays 5, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed.
The question being on the title.
Sen. Bogue moved that the title to SB 130 be amended as follows:
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Diedrich (Larry);
Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven; Koskan;
Madden; McCracken; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy; Staggers; Sutton (Dan);
Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Dennert; Hagen; Koetzle; McIntyre; Symens
Albers
SB 182:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the procedures for opting out of the
property tax freeze.
Was read the second time.
"
However, the requirements of subdivisions (3) and (4) shall be waived if:
"
However, the requirements of subdivisions (3) and (4) shall be waived if:
The question being "Shall SB 182 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 23, Nays 11, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall SJR 4 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 7, Nays 27, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the resolution not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-
elect, the President declared the resolution lost.
SB 14:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain requirements and
responsibilities of the administrator of the Human Services Center.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 14 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 25, Nays 9, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 29:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain fees for special inspections
and examination of certain weighing and measuring devices and certain standards and testing
equipment.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 29 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 25, Nays 8, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 108:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
require the acceptance of certain uniform
life insurance and annuity request forms.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 108 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 1, Excused 1, Absent 0
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Diedrich (Larry);
Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Everist; Greenfield; Ham; Kleven; Koskan; Madden; McCracken;
Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Staggers; Vitter; Whiting
Dennert; Duxbury; Hagen; Hutmacher; Koetzle; McIntyre; Moore; Reedy; Sutton (Dan);
Symens; Volesky
Albers
SJR 4:
A JOINT RESOLUTION,
proposing and submitting to the electors at the next
general election an amendment to Article XI of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota
specifying the minimum vote necessary to opt out of the property tax freeze.
Apa; Brosz; Daugaard; Drake; Everist; Putnam; Staggers
Bogue; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer);
Duxbury; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle; Koskan; Madden;
McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Reedy; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter;
Volesky; Whiting
Albers
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Diedrich (Larry);
Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Kleven; Koskan; Madden;
McCracken; Moore; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Whiting
Dennert; Duxbury; Hutmacher; Koetzle; McIntyre; Munson; Reedy; Staggers; Volesky
Excused:
Albers
Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich (Larry);
Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Greenfield; Ham; Koskan; Madden; McCracken; Moore;
Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Apa; Hagen; Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle; McIntyre; Reedy; Staggers
Albers; Everist
Yeas:
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Drake; Duxbury; Everist; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher;
Kleven; Koetzle; Koskan; Madden; McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed);
Putnam; Reedy; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter; Volesky; Whiting
Staggers
Albers
Sen. Koetzle requested a roll call vote.
Which request was supported.
The question being on Sen. Drake's motion that SB 133 be further amended.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 6, Nays 28, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Drake; Everist; Koskan; Madden; Staggers; Whiting
Nays:
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duxbury; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle;
McCracken; McIntyre; Moore; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy; Sutton (Dan); Symens;
Vitter; Volesky
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members
present, the President declared the motion lost.
The question being "Shall SB 133 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 27, Nays 6, Excused 2, Absent 0
Yeas:
Nays:
Excused:
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the President declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Apa; Bogue; Brosz; Brown (Arnold); Cradduck; Daugaard; de Hueck; Dennert; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duxbury; Greenfield; Hagen; Ham; Hutmacher; Kleven; Koetzle;
McCracken; McIntyre; Munson; Olson (Ed); Putnam; Reedy; Sutton (Dan); Symens; Vitter;
Volesky
Drake; Everist; Koskan; Madden; Staggers; Whiting
Albers; Moore
"Section 1. That chapter 3-18 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
offers of both parties, the department shall issue a recommendation on each unresolved issue
and the rationale supporting each recommendation. The department shall recommend either the
final offer of the public employees or the final offer of the public employers on each unresolved
issue and may not make any alternative recommendation. The department shall furnish a copy
of its recommendation to each of the parties and to any local newspaper for publication for the
information of the public.
Section 2. That chapter 3-18 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
3-18-8.1.
In case of impasse or failure to reach an agreement in negotiations conducted
under the provisions of this chapter, either party may request the Department of Labor to
intervene under the provisions of
§
§
60-10-1
to 60-10-3, inclusive
. Such request shall be mailed
within ten days after a written statement is delivered to the designated representative for the
other party declaring an impasse. Nothing in this section prohibits the parties to an impasse from
adopting any other procedure to facilitate a settlement that is mutually agreeable.
"
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 157 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
"Section 1. That
§
35-4-2.2
be amended to read as follows:
35-4-2.2.
A license authorized under subdivision 35-4-2(12) may only be issued to the
owner or operator of a restaurant
or a motel-hotel facility
and shall permit the licensee to serve
the enumerated beverages between 12:00 noon and 12:00 p.m. of each day of the week
including Sunday. The term restaurant as used
herein shall mean
in this section means
only a
room regularly and in a bona fide manner used and kept open for the serving of meals to guests
for compensation which has suitable table accommodations for at least fifty guests
therein
at one
and the same time, and a
connected
kitchen
connected therewith
containing conveniences for
cooking sufficient to provide meals in a bona fide manner for fifty guests at one and the same
time.
The term motel-hotel facility as used in this section means a facility used and kept open
for the hosting of large groups of guests for compensation, which has at least seventy-five beds
that are suitable lodging accommodations.
"
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 168 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 180 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 103, which was reconsidered, and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill
be amended as follows:
"Section 1. If a contract of more than ten thousand dollars is entered into for construction,
alteration, or repair of any improvement for a natural person or private entity, any contractor,
subcontractor, or construction manager who does not have liability insurance with limits of at
least one hundred thousand dollars shall, before commencing work, disclose that fact to the
person or entity using the following specific language:
"
Section 1. That
§
49-32-11
be amended to read as follows:
49-32-11. No person may, individually or through an agent or employee, and no person as an agent or employee of another person, may perform or permit another to perform any function or activity if it is probable that during the performance of such activity any person or any tool,
equipment, machinery
,
or material engaged in performing work connected with such activity,
will move to, or be placed in, a position within
six
ten
feet of any high voltage overhead
electrical line or conductor. A violation of this section is a Class 2 misdemeanor.
"
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB
151 and returns the same without recommendation.
Also MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB
99 which was deferred to the 36th Legislative Day.
HB 1058:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
appropriate money to the Edgemont
school district.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
HB 1109:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
exempt local governments from certain
competitive bid requirements.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Local Government.
HB 1130:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the provisions related to the sale
of surplus governmental property.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Local Government.
HB 1135:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for the reclassification of certain
real property.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxation.
HB 1165:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
permit more time to file local
referendums.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Local Government.
HB 1182:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow evidence of a prior offense of
sexual assault under certain circumstances when a defendant is charged with a sex crime.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
HB 1198:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for a maximum amount in the
property tax reduction fund.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
HB 1218:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the definition of the term, crime
of violence.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
HB 1279:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
establish the South Dakota Municipal
Facilities Authority, to provide for the establishment of one or more special purpose
corporations by the South Dakota Municipal Facilities Authority, to establish the powers of the
South Dakota Municipal Facilities Authority and each such corporation, including the power
to acquire, own, lease, sublease and dispose of certain land, improvements and capital
equipment comprising all or a portion of any municipal facilities, including any system or part
of a system of waterworks, sewage or waste disposal, and to establish or confirm the powers of
the state, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the Board of Water and
Natural Resources, the South Dakota Conservancy District and municipalities and other public
entities of the state in connection therewith.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on State Affairs.
HB 1195:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
increase the amount transferred to the
budget reserve fund.