The House convened at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to adjournment, the Speaker presiding.
The prayer was offered by the Chaplain, Pastor Gale Shafer, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance led by House page Jessica Fritzsche.
Roll Call: All members present except Reps. Davis, Eccarius, Koetzle, and Lockner who
were excused.
The Committee on Taxation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1236 and 1252 which were deferred to the 41st legislative day.
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1255 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass.
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1256 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass and be placed on the
Consent Calendar.
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1122 which was tabled.
The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1261 which was deferred to the 41st legislative day.
"
41-6-78.
The Department of Game, Fish and Parks may issue any resident, as defined by
this title, a resident professional dog training license. The license permits the licensee to train
or engage in the business of training hunting or field trial dogs when and where wild game is
found. For purposes of this section, a professional dog trainer is any person who trains or sells
any breed of hunting dog for remuneration. The license shall be issued annually. No licensee
may be allowed to No person may train dogs on wild game birds from April fifteenth to July
thirty-first, inclusive. The licensee shall comply with rules adopted pursuant to
§
41-2-18 by
the Game, Fish and Parks commission to protect and perpetuate the wild game resources of the
state. Such rules may limit the number of licenses issued and further restrict professional dog
training on public lands. Failure to comply with such rules or the provisions of this section shall
be cause for revocation of license and nonissuance of future licenses.
No person may train dogs
on wild game birds from April fifteenth to July thirty-first, inclusive. The commission shall
promulgate rules pursuant to chapter 1-26 to impose restrictions on the methods, dates, and
number of dogs that may be trained on public lands and public rights-of-way.
Any person who
violates this section is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.
Section 2. That
§
41-6-79
be repealed.
41-6-79.
The department of game, fish and parks may issue any nonresident a nonresident
professional dog training license. The nonresident professional dog training license entitles the
licensee to all the privileges and is subject to all the restrictions and penalty provisions as the
resident professional dog training license provided by
§
41-6-78.
Section 3. That
§
41-6-10
be amended to read as follows:
41-6-10.
Licenses, permits, and stamps issued under this title are classified as follows:
The Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources respectfully reports that it has had
under consideration HCR 1004 and returns the same with the recommendation that said
resolution be adopted.
The Committee on Appropriations respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 25 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass.
The Committee on Appropriations respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1073 which was tabled.
The Committee on Education respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1225 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass and be placed on the
Consent Calendar.
"
Section 16. That chapter 13-33 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
MR. SPEAKER:
I have the honor to return herewith HB 1035 and 1036 which have been amended by the
Senate and your concurrence in the amendments is respectfully requested.
I have the honor to transmit herewith SB 98, 162, 190, and 202 which have passed the
Senate and your favorable consideration is respectfully requested.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
I have the honor to return herewith HB 1032 and 1061 which have passed the Senate
without change.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Senate has concurred in House
amendments to SB 30 and 31.
Yesterday, Rep. Volesky announced his intention to reconsider the vote by which HB 1065
was lost.
Rep. Apa moved to reconsider the vote by which HB 1065 was lost.
The question being on Rep. Apa's motion to reconsider the vote by which HB 1065 was
lost.
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Richard); Clark; Cutler; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer);
Duenwald; Duniphan; Earley; Engbrecht; Fiegen; Fryslie; Garnos; Hennies; Jaspers; Juhnke;
Klaudt; Konold; Koskan; McCoy; McNenny; Michels; Munson (Donald); Peterson; Pummel;
Putnam; Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Duane); Wetz; Wudel; Young;
Speaker Hunt
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect,
the Speaker declared the motion lost.
Rep. Volesky moved that the Committee on Taxation be instructed to deliver HB 1119 to
the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
Which motion was not supported.
Rep. Daniel Sutton moved that the Committee on State Affairs be instructed to deliver HB
1100 to the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Daniel Sutton's motion that the Committee on State Affairs be
instructed to deliver HB 1100 to the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 18, Nays 48, Excused 4, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Fischer-Clemens; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Kazmerzak; Lucas;
McIntyre; Nachtigal; Patterson; Sutton (Daniel); Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wilson
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner
Which motion was not supported.
Rep. Cutler moved that when we adjourn today, we adjourn to convene at 1:00 p.m. on
Friday, February 5th, the 19th legislative day.
Which motion prevailed.
Which motion prevailed and the reports were adopted.
Rep. Broderick moved that SB 66 be referred back to the Committee on Transportation.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so referred.
HB 1135:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow certain community-based primary
health organizations to provide publicly funded dental services.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1135 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 64, Nays 1, Excused 5, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Clark; Crisp;
Cutler; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Duniphan; Earley; Engbrecht;
Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Jaspers; Juhnke;
Kazmerzak; Klaudt; Koehn; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre;
McNenny; Michels; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Napoli; Patterson; Peterson;
Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Sutton
(Duane); Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wilson; Windhorst; Wudel; Young; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Apa
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Hennies; Koetzle; Lockner
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1134:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain provisions concerning
weight and speed allowances for certain harvest vehicles.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
Rep. Wetz moved that HB 1134 and all pending amendments be laid on the table.
Nays were:
Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Derby;
Diedrich (Larry); Earley; Fischer-Clemens; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Juhnke; Kazmerzak; Klaudt;
Koehn; Kooistra; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; Michels; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal;
Patterson; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Wilson; Windhorst; Wudel
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect,
the Speaker declared the motion lost.
Rep. Roe moved that all pending amendments to HB 1134 be laid on the table.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Roe's motion that all pending amendments to HB 1134 be laid
on the table.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 56, Nays 8, Excused 6, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler;
Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Duniphan; Engbrecht; Fiegen; Fischer-
Clemens; Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Hennies; Jaspers; Juhnke;
Kazmerzak; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; McNenny; Michels;
Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Patterson; Peterson; Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Sebert;
Slaughter; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Sutton (Duane); Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wilson;
Wudel; Young; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Apa; Derby; Earley; Klaudt; Koehn; Monroe; Napoli; Windhorst
Rep. Crisp moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being "Shall HB 1134 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 52, Nays 12, Excused 6, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler;
Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Engbrecht; Fischer-Clemens;
Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Hennies; Jaspers; Juhnke; Kazmerzak;
Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; McNenny; Michels; Munson
(Donald); Nachtigal; Patterson; Pummel; Putnam; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Solum; Sutton
(Daniel); Sutton (Duane); Volesky; Waltman; Wetz; Wilson; Windhorst; Wudel; Young
Nays were:
Apa; Duniphan; Earley; Fiegen; Klaudt; Koehn; Monroe; Napoli; Peterson; Richter; Weber;
Speaker Hunt
Excused were:
Clark; Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner; Smidt
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1189:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
repeal the requirement that certain
proposals for the regulation of professions and occupations be reviewed prior to session.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1189 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Apa; Broderick; Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Fischer-Clemens;
Fitzgerald; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Kazmerzak; Kooistra; Lintz; Lucas; McIntyre; Munson
(Donald); Nachtigal; Patterson; Putnam; Roe; Sutton (Daniel); Volesky; Waltman; Weber;
Wetz; Wilson; Windhorst; Wudel
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill lost.
Rep. Fiegen announced her intention to reconsider the vote by which HB 1189 was lost.
HB 1015:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain election procedures for the
formation of certain special districts and the election of directors, managers, or trustees.
Having had its second reading was up for reconsideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall HB 1015 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 61, Nays 4, Excused 5, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Clark;
Cutler; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Duniphan; Earley; Engbrecht;
Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Hennies; Jaspers;
Juhnke; Kazmerzak; Klaudt; Koehn; Konold; Koskan; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre;
McNenny; Michels; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Patterson; Pummel; Putnam;
Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Sutton (Duane); Waltman;
Weber; Wetz; Wilson; Windhorst; Wudel; Young; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Crisp; Kooistra; Napoli; Volesky
HB 1009:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
require a managed care plan to have a
medical director or director.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1009 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 57, Nays 7, Excused 6, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Clark;
Crisp; Cutler; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Earley; Engbrecht;
Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Hennies; Juhnke;
Kazmerzak; Koehn; Konold; Kooistra; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; Michels; Monroe;
Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Patterson; Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter;
Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Sutton (Duane); Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wilson;
Wudel; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Duniphan; Jaspers; Klaudt; Koskan; Napoli; Windhorst; Young
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner; McNenny; Peterson
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1010:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide certain protections for persons
enrolled in managed care plans.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1010 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Brooks; Duniphan; Klaudt; Monroe; Napoli; Windhorst; Young
Excused were:
Brown (Richard); Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner; McNenny; Peterson
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1011:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide covered persons in managed care
plans with reasonable access to providers.
Was read the second time.
"
Section 5. For purposes of this Act, a managed care plan does not include individual health
policies if:
Rep. Richter moved that HB 1011 be placed to follow HB 1186 on today's calendar.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so placed.
HB 1012:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide utilization review of managed
care plans.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1012 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 52, Nays 11, Excused 6, Absent and Not Voting 1
Yeas were:
Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Cerny; Chicoine; Clark; Crisp; Cutler; Derby; Diedrich
(Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Earley; Engbrecht; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fryslie;
Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Hennies; Jaspers; Juhnke; Kazmerzak; Konold; Kooistra; Lintz;
Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; Michels; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Patterson; Peterson; Pummel;
Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Sutton (Duane); Volesky;
Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wilson; Wudel; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Apa; Burg; Duniphan; Fitzgerald; Klaudt; Koehn; McNenny; Monroe; Napoli; Windhorst;
Young
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Koskan; Lockner; Putnam
Absent and Not Voting were:
Brown (Richard)
HB 1013:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
establish certain requirements regarding
coverage of emergency medical services in managed care plans.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1013 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 53, Nays 6, Excused 8, Absent and Not Voting 3
Yeas were:
Apa; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Clark;
Crisp; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Earley; Engbrecht; Fiegen;
Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Hanson; Hennies; Jaspers; Juhnke;
Kazmerzak; Koehn; Konold; Kooistra; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; McNenny; Michels;
Munson (Donald); Patterson; Peterson; Pummel; Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum;
Sutton (Daniel); Sutton (Duane); Volesky; Waltman; Wetz; Wudel; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Duniphan; Klaudt; Monroe; Napoli; Windhorst; Young
Excused were:
Cutler; Davis; Eccarius; Haley; Koetzle; Koskan; Lockner; Putnam
Absent and Not Voting were:
Nachtigal; Weber; Wilson
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1183:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain provisions regarding
consumer installment sales contracts.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1183 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 51, Nays 9, Excused 10, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Derby;
Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Earley; Engbrecht; Fischer-Clemens;
Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Hanson; Hennies; Juhnke; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Lintz;
Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; McNenny; Michels; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal;
Patterson; Peterson; Pummel; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Sutton
(Duane); Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Windhorst; Young; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Crisp; Duniphan; Jaspers; Kazmerzak; Klaudt; Koehn; Napoli; Richter; Wilson
Excused were:
Clark; Cutler; Davis; Eccarius; Fiegen; Haley; Koetzle; Lockner; Putnam; Wudel
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Rep. Roe now presiding.
HB 1186:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
ensure that minors do not gain access to
obscene materials on certain public access computers and to limit liability for certain related
actions.
Was read the second time.
Nays were:
Apa; Duniphan; Hagen; Haley; Kazmerzak; Koehn; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; Munson (Donald);
Nachtigal; Napoli; Patterson; Windhorst; Young
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Fryslie; Koetzle; Lockner
Absent and Not Voting were:
Diedrich (Larry)
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members present,
the Speaker declared the motion carried and HB 1186 was so amended.
Rep. Konold moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being "Shall HB 1186 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Apa; Broderick; Duniphan; Fryslie; Hagen; Haley; Kazmerzak; Koehn; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy;
McIntyre; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Napoli; Patterson; Pummel; Roe; Solum; Waltman;
Windhorst
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed.
The question being on the title.
Rep. Hennies moved that the title to HB 1186 be amended as follows:
Speaker Hunt now presiding.
HB 1011:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide covered persons in managed care
plans with reasonable access to providers.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
Section 6. If an employer provides a managed care plan to eligible employees and the plan
restricts access to providers and does not provide a point of service or out-of-network benefit,
the employer shall offer at the time of enrollment and annually thereafter, an alternative health
benefit plan that is either a nonnetwork plan or a network plan that provides out-of-network
services. Unless the employer chooses to provide any extra contribution to the premium, any
extra cost associated with the alternative health benefit plan required by this section shall be
borne by the employee choosing that coverage and at no additional cost to the employer.
"
The question being "Shall HB 1011 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 48, Nays 13, Excused 8, Absent and Not Voting 1
Yeas were:
Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler; Derby;
Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Earley; Engbrecht; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens;
Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Hennies; Juhnke; Kazmerzak; Konold; Kooistra;
Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; Michels; Munson (Donald); Patterson; Peterson; Pummel; Putnam;
Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Sutton (Duane); Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz;
Wilson; Wudel; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Apa; Broderick; Duniphan; Fitzgerald; Jaspers; Klaudt; Koehn; Koskan; Lintz; McNenny;
Napoli; Windhorst; Young
Excused were:
Clark; Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner; Monroe; Solum; Sutton (Daniel)
Absent and Not Voting were:
Nachtigal
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
The question being "Shall HB 1217 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 60, Nays 5, Excused 5, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp;
Cutler; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Duniphan; Earley; Engbrecht;
Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Hanson; Hennies; Jaspers;
Juhnke; Klaudt; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy; McIntyre; McNenny;
Michels; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Napoli; Peterson; Pummel; Putnam; Richter;
Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Daniel); Sutton (Duane); Volesky; Weber; Wetz;
Wilson; Windhorst; Wudel; Young; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Haley; Kazmerzak; Koehn; Patterson; Waltman
Excused were:
Clark; Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1056:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain requirements for
coordination of benefits of group health plans.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1056 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Crisp; Kazmerzak; Kooistra
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Koetzle; Lockner
Absent and Not Voting were:
Napoli; Young
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1107:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain provisions regarding
mutually binding agreements between beer wholesalers and brewers, to revise a term relative
to beer industry relationships, and to make provisions for malt beverage brand extensions.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1107 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 63, Nays 2, Excused 5, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Burg; Cerny; Chicoine; Clark;
Crisp; Cutler; Derby; Diedrich (Larry); Diedtrich (Elmer); Duenwald; Duniphan; Earley;
Engbrecht; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fryslie; Garnos; Hagen; Haley; Hanson; Hennies; Jaspers;
Juhnke; Kazmerzak; Klaudt; Koehn; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Lintz; Lucas; McCoy;
McIntyre; McNenny; Michels; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Nachtigal; Napoli; Patterson;
Peterson; Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Sebert; Slaughter; Smidt; Solum; Sutton (Daniel);
Sutton (Duane); Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wilson; Wudel; Young; Speaker Hunt
Nays were:
Volesky; Windhorst
Excused were:
Davis; Eccarius; Fitzgerald; Koetzle; Lockner
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Rep. Cutler moved that HB 1203, 1077, 1096, 1259, and 1168 be deferred until Friday,
February 5th, the 19th legislative day.
Which motion prevailed and the bills were so deferred.
SB 98:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
require a bail bondsperson to be licensed
in the state to conduct bail bondsperson activities in the state.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
SB 162:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
increase the penalty for second convictions
for criminal pedophilia.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
SB 202:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the venue provisions relating to
administrative appeals.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that HB 1024, 1060, 1062,
1063, and 1064 were delivered to his Excellency, the Governor, for his approval at 10:25 a.m.,
February 4, 1999.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Office of Engrossing
and Enrolling has carefully compared HB 1032 and 1061 and finds the same correctly enrolled.
The Speaker publicly read the title to
HB 1032:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the causes for which a teacher's
certificate may be revoked or suspended and to declare an emergency.
HB 1061:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the provisions exempting certain
persons from service as jurors.
HC 1007
Introduced by:
Representatives Young and Apa and Senator Dunn (Jim)
A LEGISLATIVE COMMEMORATION,
Honoring the memory of Mr. Josef Meier, who
played the role of Jesus Christ in the world renowned Spearfish Passion Play for nearly
sixty years.
Rep. Jaspers moved that the House do now adjourn, which motion prevailed, and at
5:37 p.m. the House adjourned.