84th Legislative Session _ 2009

Committee: House State Affairs
Thursday, February 19, 2009

                                            P - Present
                                            E - Excused
                                            A - Absent

Roll Call
P    Boomgarden
P    Engels
P    Feinstein
P    Gosch
P    Hunhoff (Bernie)
P    Lucas
P    Lust
P    Noem, Vice-Chair
P    Rausch
P    Rave
P    Steele
P    Turbiville
P    Faehn, Chair

OTHERS PRESENT: See Original Minutes

The meeting was called to order by Representative Bob Faehn, Chair..

MOTION:     TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF 4:00 PM WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2009

Moved by:    Turbiville
Second by:    Steele
Action:    Prevailed by voice vote.

        
HB 1285: place certain restrictions on the granting of easements associated with pipelines.

Proponents:    Representative Dean Wink
        Sylvia Christen, Dakota Rural Action


Opponents:    Brett Koenecke, SD Electric Utilitiy Companies
        Dennis Duncan, Trans Canada Corporation

MOTION:     DEFER HB 1285 TO THE 41ST LEGISLATIVE DAY

Moved by:    Rausch
Second by:    Turbiville
Action:    Prevailed by roll call vote. (13-0-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Boomgarden, Engels, Feinstein, Gosch, Hunhoff (Bernie), Lucas, Lust, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville, Faehn

HB 1286 WAS RECONSIDERED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULE 7-7

MOTION:     DO NOT PASS HB 1286

Moved by:    Noem
Second by:    Rave
Action:    Prevailed by roll call vote. (11-2-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Boomgarden, Gosch, Hunhoff (Bernie), Lucas, Lust, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville, Faehn

Voting No:    Engels, Feinstein

        
HB 1125: prohibit the use of certain wireless communications devices while driving.

Presented by:    Representative Eldon Nygaard (Handout: 1)

MOTION:     DEFER HB 1125 TO THE 41ST LEGISLATIVE DAY

Moved by:    Turbiville
Second by:    Gosch
Action:    Was not acted on.

MOTION:     SUBSTITUTE MOTION DO PASS HB 1125

Moved by:    Feinstein
Second by:    Lucas
Action:    Failed by roll call vote. (5-8-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Engels, Feinstein, Hunhoff (Bernie), Lucas, Faehn

Voting No:    Boomgarden, Gosch, Lust, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville

MOTION:     DEFER HB 1125 TO THE 41ST LEGISLATIVE DAY

Moved by:    Turbiville
Second by:    Gosch
Action:    Prevailed by roll call vote. (9-4-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Boomgarden, Gosch, Lust, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville, Faehn

Voting No:    Engels, Feinstein, Hunhoff (Bernie), Lucas

        
HB 1176: clarify unemployment benefits.

Presented by:    Representative Brian Gosch
Proponents:    Pam Roberts, Secretary, Department of Labor (Handout: 2)
        David Owen, SD Chamber of Commerce & Industry

MOTION:     AMEND HB 1176

1176sa

     On page 2, line 12, of the printed bill, remove the overstrikes from " or ".

     On page 3, line 3, delete " ; or " and insert ".".

     On page 3, delete lines 4 and 5.


Moved by:    Gosch
Second by:    Noem
Action:    Prevailed by voice vote.

MOTION:     DO PASS HB 1176 AS AMENDED

Moved by:    Lust
Second by:    Noem
Action:    Was not acted on.
    


MOTION:     SUBSTITUTE MOTION AMEND HB 1176

Representative Engles distributed handout #3.
1176ra

     On the printed bill, delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

     "      Section 1. That subdivision (2) of § 61-1-1 be amended to read as follows:

             (2)      "Base period," the first four out of the last five completed calendar quarters or the last four completed calendar quarters immediately preceding an the first day of the individual's benefit year. For an individual who fails to meet the qualifications of § 61-6-7 due to the receipt of temporary total disability payments under worker's compensation, the base period is the first four of the last five completed quarters preceding the disability if a claim for unemployment benefits is filed within twenty-four months of the date on which the individual's disability was incurred. However, no calendar quarter used in one base period of a valid claim may be used in a subsequent base period;

     Section 2. That chapter 61-1 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

     For the purposes of establishing a benefit year, the department shall initially use the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters as the base period. If a benefit year is not established using the first four of the last five calendar quarters as the base period, the department shall use the last four completed calendar quarters as the base period. Computations using the last four completed calendar quarters shall be based on available wage items processed as of the close of business on the day preceding the date of application. The department shall promptly contact employers to request assistance in obtaining wage information for the last completed calendar quarter if it has not been reported at the time of initial application.

     Section 3. That § 61-6-13.1 be amended to read as follows:

     61-6-13.1.   "Good cause" for voluntarily leaving employment is restricted to leaving employment because:

             (1)      Continued employment presents a hazard to the employee's health. However, this subdivision applies only if:

             (a)      Prior to the separation from the employment the employee is examined by a licensed practitioner of the healing arts, as defined in chapter 36-4 or 36-5, and


advised that continued employment presents a hazard to his health; and

             (b)      The health hazard is supported by a certificate signed by the licensed practitioner of the healing arts.

     The secretary of labor may request an additional certificate signed by another licensed practitioner of the healing arts, as defined in chapter 36-4 or 36-5;

             (2)      The employer required the employee to relocate the employee's residence to hold the employee's job;

             (3)      The employer's conduct demonstrates a substantial disregard of the standards of behavior that the employee has a right to expect of an employer or the employer has breached or substantially altered the contract for employment;

             (4)      An individual accepted employment while on lay off and subsequently quit the employment to return to work for the individual's regular employer; or

             (5)      The employee's religious belief mandates it. This provision does not apply, however, if the employer has offered to the employee reasonable accommodations taking into consideration the employee's religious beliefs if this offer is made before the employee leaves the employment; or

             (6)      Leaving is necessary to protect the individual from domestic abuse. However, this subdivision applies only if:

             (a)      The employee reports the abusive situation to law enforcement within forty-eight hours of any occurrence and cooperates fully with law enforcement in any subsequent investigation and criminal charge relating to the abusive situation. Upon request by the department, the law enforcement agency shall complete and return to the department a certification form indicating whether the employee has complied with the requirements of this subdivision;

             (b)      The employee has left the abusive situation and remains separate from the situation; and

             (c)      The employee made reasonable efforts to preserve the employment before quitting ; or

             (7)    The leaving was caused by the illness or disability of the employee or an immediate family member and the employee took all reasonable precautions to protect the employee's employment status by promptly notifying the employer of the reasons for the absence and by promptly requesting reemployment when again able to resume employment .

     Any person found to have good cause for leaving employment due to domestic abuse as set forth in subdivision (6) and who returns to the abusive situation is ineligible for benefits. "


Moved by:    Engels
Second by:    Lucas
Action:    Failed by voice vote.

MOTION:     DO PASS HB 1176 AS AMENDED

Moved by:    Rave
Second by:    Noem
Action:    Prevailed by roll call vote. (13-0-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Boomgarden, Engels, Feinstein, Gosch, Hunhoff (Bernie), Lucas, Lust, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville, Faehn

MOTION:     AMEND TITLE OF HB 1176

1176sta

     On page 1, line 1, of the printed bill, delete "authorize" and insert "clarify".

     On page 1, line 1, delete everything after "benefits" and insert ".".

     On page 1, delete line 2.


Moved by:    Noem
Second by:    Rave
Action:    Prevailed by voice vote.

        
HB 1289: provide for legislative redistricting based on single- member house districts.

Presented by:    Representative Peggy Gibson
Opponents:    Representative Kent Juhnke



MOTION:    DEFER HB 1289 TO THE 41ST LEGISLATIVE DAY

Moved by:    Turbiville
Second by:    Noem
Action:    Prevailed by roll call vote. (8-5-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Feinstein, Gosch, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville, Faehn

Voting No:    Boomgarden, Engels, Hunhoff (Bernie), Lucas, Lust

        
HB 1290: increase the state's percentage of the net machine income from video lottery and to declare an emergency.

Presented by:    Representative Peggy Gibson (Handout: 4)
Proponents:    Representative Bernie Hunhoff
        Mark Weber, Self, Sioux Falls (Handout: 5)
Opponents:    Norman Lingle, SD Lottery
        Bob Riter Jr., Music & Vending Association of SD
        Larry Mann, M. G. Oil Company
        Carey Story, Self, Chamberlain

MOTION:     DEFER HB 1290 TO THE 41ST LEGISLATIVE DAY

Moved by:    Rausch
Second by:    Turbiville
Action:    Prevailed by roll call vote. (12-1-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Boomgarden, Engels, Feinstein, Gosch, Lucas, Lust, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville, Faehn

Voting No:    Hunhoff (Bernie)

        
HB 1291: provide for legislative redistricting by a bipartisan, nonlegislative commission.

Presented by:    Representative Bill Thompson
Opponents:    Representative Kent Juhnke


MOTION:     DO PASS HB 1291

Moved by:    Lucas
Second by:    Engels
Action:    Was not acted on.

MOTION:     SUBSTITUTE MOTION DEFER HB 1291 TO THE 41ST LEGISLATIVE DAY

Moved by:    Noem
Second by:    Rave
Action:    Prevailed by roll call vote. (9-4-0-0)

Voting Yes:    Boomgarden, Gosch, Lust, Noem, Rausch, Rave, Steele, Turbiville, Faehn

Voting No:    Engels, Feinstein, Hunhoff (Bernie), Lucas

MOTION:     ADJOURN

Moved by:    Rausch
Second by:    Rave
Action:    Prevailed by voice vote.

Eileen Eller

____________________________

Committee Secretary
Bob Faehn, Chair