The House convened at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to adjournment, the Speaker presiding.
The prayer was offered by the Chaplain, Pastor Kent Atkinson, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance led by House page Carly McCuen.
Roll Call: All members present except Rep. Hassard who was excused.
Rep. Duenwald
introduced the 1998 South Dakota Snow Queen, Mikaela Claymore,
Gettysburg, SD.
Rep. de Hueck
introduced the 1998 National Little Britches Rodeo Queen, Jessica Melvin,
Pierre, SD.
The Committee on Taxation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1231 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do not pass as amended:
On page 2, line 4, overstrike the first "and".
And that as so amended said bill do not pass.
The Committee on Appropriations respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1282 which was deferred to the 36th legislative day.
The Committee on Transportation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 130 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass.
The Committee on Transportation respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
SB 116, 117, 137, and 66 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bills do pass
and be placed on the Consent Calendar.
"
Section
1.
That
§
32-12-17
be amended to read as follows:
32-12-17.
The Department of Commerce and Regulation shall, upon payment of the fee
established by
§
32-12-16, issue to
every
each
applicant qualifying therefor an operator's
license. The license shall bear thereon a distinguishing number assigned to the licensee, the full
legal name or any name lawfully taken, date of birth, residence address, an indication if the
licensee is a donor pursuant to chapter 34-26, an indication if the licensee has a living will
pursuant to chapter 34-12D or a durable power of attorney for health care pursuant to chapter
59-7, a color photo and a brief description of the licensee, and the licensee's signature. The
department shall indicate upon each driver's license the general class of vehicles which the
licensee may drive.
If a bar code, or other means by which information may be taken
electronically, is placed on the license, the data field shall contain the information appearing on
the license and the licensee's social security number. However, the social security number shall
be encrypted.
Section
2.
That chapter 32-12 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
Section
3.
That chapter 32-12 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
Section
4.
That chapter 32-12 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
"
Section 2. That
§
26-8A-2
be amended to read as follows:
26-8A-2.
In this chapter and chapter 26-7A, the term "abused or neglected child" means a
child:
Section 4. That
§
35-4-99
be amended to read as follows:
35-4-99.
All licensed premises shall prominently display the sign provided for in
§
35-4-100. The sign shall be displayed in such a manner as to provide an unobstructed view
to the customers of such licensee. Failure to display such sign is a
petty offense
Class 1
misdemeanor
.
"
"
Section 1. The Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council is requested to
conduct an interim study of direct entry midwifery. The study shall be aimed at developing
standards for the practice of direct entry midwifery in the state.
"
The Committee on Health and Human Services respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1319 and returns the same without recommendation.
The Committee on Health and Human Services respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1208 and 1327 which were deferred to the 36th legislative day.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Health and Human Services respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1162, which was amended as follows:
"
" Section 1. Before pleading guilty or nolo contendere to first or second offense driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs or before pleading guilty or nolo contendere to reckless
or careless driving arising out of an alcohol or drug related arrest, or after being found guilty at
trial, a defendant shall have an alcohol or drug evaluation by:
For a first offense, the court may order the defendant to attend a sixteen-hour alcohol or drug
education program approved by the South Dakota Chemical Dependency Certification Board
or the South Dakota Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse. After considering the defendant's
alcohol or drug evaluation, the court may order additional education or treatment.
Notwithstanding indigence, the defendant shall be responsible for the cost of the evaluation and
education, and if ordered to treatment by the court, shall secure funding for the treatment cost.
For a second offense, after considering the defendant's alcohol or drug evaluation, the court
may order in-patient or out-patient education or treatment in addition to the sixteen-hour alcohol
or drug education program. Notwithstanding indigence, the defendant shall be responsible for
the cost of the evaluation and education, and if ordered to treatment by the court, shall secure
funding for the treatment cost.
"
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1312 and returns the same without recommendation and that said bill be amended as follows:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1321 which was tabled.
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1307 and 1311 which were deferred to the 36th legislative day.
MR. SPEAKER:
I have the honor to transmit herewith SB 92, 156, 161, 218, 228, 235, 236, and 239 which
have passed the Senate and your favorable consideration is respectfully requested.
I have the honor to return herewith HB 1008, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1060, 1061,
1062, 1064, 1077, 1141, 1167, 1209, and 1239 which have passed the Senate without change.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
I have the honor to return herewith HB 1080 which has been amended by the Senate and
your concurrence in the amendment is respectfully requested.
Rep. de Hueck moved that the House do concur in the Senate amendments to HB 1204.
The question being on Rep. de Hueck's motion that the House do concur in the Senate
amendments to HB 1204.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 66, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent and Not Voting 3
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard);
Cerny; Chicoine; Collier; Crisp; Davis; de Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan;
Duxbury; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Gleason; Hagen; Haley;
Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson (Doug); Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Lee;
Lockner; Lucas; Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald); Napoli;
Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman;
Schrempp; Smidt; Sokolow; Solum; Sperry; Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wick;
Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Excused were:
Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Cutler; Jorgensen; Van Gerpen
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and the amendments were concurred in.
Nays were:
Windhorst
Excused were:
Cutler; Diedrich; Hassard
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and HCR 1012 was adopted.
Yesterday, Rep. Gabriel announced his intention to reconsider the vote by which HB 1197
was lost.
Rep. Gabriel moved to reconsider the vote by which HB 1197 was lost.
The question being on Rep. Gabriel's motion to reconsider the vote by which HB 1197 was
lost.
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Barker; Brown (Jarvis); Cerny; Chicoine; Collier; Crisp; Davis; Duxbury; Fischer-Clemens;
Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Lockner; Lucas; Moore; Schaunaman; Schrempp;
Sokolow; Sperry; Volesky; Waltman; Windhorst
Excused were:
Diedrich; Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Roe; Van Gerpen
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and HB 1197 was up for reconsideration and final passage.
HB 1197:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to increase the penalties for drug
distribution and storage and for possession of drugs and drug paraphernalia.
Having had its second reading was up for reconsideration and final passage.
Rep. Matthews moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being on Rep. Duniphan's motion that HB 1197 be amended.
Which motion prevailed and HB 1197 was so amended.
Rep. Richter moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
Nays were:
Barker; Brown (Jarvis); Cerny; Chicoine; Collier; Crisp; Cutler; Davis; de Hueck; Derby;
Duxbury; Fischer-Clemens; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Kooistra; Lockner;
Lucas; Moore; Munson (Donald); Roe; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sokolow; Sperry; Volesky;
Waltman; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Excused were:
Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Rep. Lucas moved that the Committee on Appropriations be instructed to deliver HB 1282
to the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Lucas' motion that the Committee on Appropriations be
instructed to deliver HB 1282 to the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 26, Nays 41, Excused 3, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Barker; Cerny; Chicoine; Collier; Davis; de Hueck; Duxbury; Fischer-Clemens; Gleason;
Hagen; Haley; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Kooistra; Lee; Lockner; Lucas; Matthews; Moore;
Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sokolow; Sperry; Volesky; Waltman; Weber
Excused were:
Hassard; Wick; Windhorst
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of one-third of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion was supported and the committee was so instructed.
Rep. Brown (Richard) moved that the Committee on Local Government be instructed to
deliver HB 1001 to the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
Which motion was not supported.
Rep. Haley moved that the Committee on State Affairs be instructed to deliver HB 1300
to the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Haley's motion that the Committee on State Affairs be
instructed to deliver HB 1300 to the floor of the House, pursuant to Joint Rule 7-7.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 22, Nays 46, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Cerny; Chicoine; Davis; Duxbury; Fischer-Clemens; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Kazmerzak;
Koetzle; Kooistra; Lee; Lockner; Lucas; Moore; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sokolow; Sperry;
Volesky; Waltman; Weber
Nays were:
Apa; Barker; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard);
Collier; Crisp; Cutler; de Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Eccarius; Fiegen;
Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Koskan; Kredit; Madden;
Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Napoli; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill);
Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Smidt; Solum; Van Gerpen; Wetz; Wick; Windhorst;
Speaker Hagg
HCR 1013
Introduced by:
Representatives Diedrich, de Hueck, Derby, Duxbury, Fiegen,
Jaspers, Johnson (Doug), Kazmerzak, Koskan, Matthews, McNenny, Roe, Rost, Smidt, Sperry,
Van Gerpen, Waltman, and Weber and Senators Hainje, Brown (Arnold), Everist, and
Halverson
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION,
Supporting the use of soybean-based diesel fuel in state
vehicles.
Which motion prevailed and the reports were adopted.
Rep. Koetzle moved that HB 1276 be placed on the calendar of Thursday, February 12th,
the 23rd legislative day.
The question being on Rep. Koetzle's motion that HB 1276 be placed on the calendar of
Thursday, February 12th, the 23rd legislative day.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 29, Nays 39, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Barker; Cerny; Chicoine; Collier; Davis; Duxbury; Fischer-Clemens; Gleason; Hagen; Haley;
Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Kooistra; Lee; Lockner; Lucas; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald);
Peterson (Bill); Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sokolow; Sperry; Volesky; Waltman; Wick;
Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Apa; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Crisp; Cutler; de
Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Hunt;
Jaspers; Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Konold; Koskan; Kredit; Madden; Matthews; McNenny;
Napoli; Pederson (Gordon); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Smidt; Solum; Van Gerpen;
Weber; Wetz
Excused were:
Belatti; Hassard
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect,
the Speaker declared the motion lost.
Nays were:
Apa; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Crisp; Cutler; Derby;
Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Eccarius; Fiegen; Gabriel; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson (Doug);
Jorgensen; Konold; Koskan; Kredit; Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Pederson (Gordon);
Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Smidt; Solum; Van Gerpen; Wetz; Wick; Windhorst
Excused were:
Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Brown (Gary); Napoli
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect,
the Speaker declared the motion lost.
Rep. McNenny moved that the word "not" be stricken from the report of the Committee
on Commerce on HB 1175 and that HB 1175 be placed on tomorrow's calendar.
The question being on Rep. McNenny's motion that the word "not" be stricken from the
report of the Committee on Commerce on HB 1175 and that HB 1175 be placed on tomorrow's
calendar.
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Barker; Belatti; Brooks; Collier; Crisp; Davis; de Hueck; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens;
Kooistra; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Smidt; Sokolow; Wick; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Excused were:
Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Brown (Gary); Napoli
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and HB 1175 was so placed.
SB 58:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the requirement for real estate brokers
to furnish closing statements in a real estate transaction.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 58 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 65, Nays 0, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 3
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Cerny; Chicoine;
Crisp; Cutler; Davis; de Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Duxbury; Eccarius;
Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson
(Doug); Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Lee; Lockner;
Lucas; Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald); Pederson (Gordon);
Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Smidt;
Sokolow; Solum; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wick; Speaker Hagg
Absent and Not Voting were:
Brown (Gary); Collier; Napoli
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1013:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to provide for the issuance of a landowner
license to hunt certain big game animals.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall HB 1013 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 64, Nays 3, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 1
Yeas were:
Apa; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Cerny;
Chicoine; Crisp; Davis; de Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Duxbury; Eccarius;
Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson
(Doug); Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Lee; Lockner;
Lucas; Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald); Napoli; Pederson
(Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman; Schrempp;
Smidt; Solum; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wick; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Barker; Collier; Sokolow
Excused were:
Hassard; Windhorst
Absent and Not Voting were:
Cutler
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1186: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to require the transfer of certain money into the property tax reduction fund.
"
Section 1. Notwithstanding
§
4-7-32, on July 1, 1998, or at such time that the fiscal year
1998 general fund ending unobligated cash balance is determined, if the unobligated cash
balance is equal to or more than one million nine hundred sixty-four thousand dollars
($1,964,000), there is hereby appropriated from the general fund the sum of one million nine
hundred sixty-four thousand dollars ($1,964,000), eight hundred twenty thousand dollars
($820,000) in federal fund authority and one million six hundred thirty-two thousand two
hundred twenty-five dollars ($1,632,225) in other fund authority; or so much thereof as may be
necessary, to the Bureau of Personnel for the purpose of a one-time one percent across the board
pay supplement for state employees. This supplement shall be in addition to the salary policy
approved by the Seventy-third Legislature, and be given to all permanent employees of the
executive, legislative, and judicial branches of state government.
Section 2. Money appropriated by this Act shall be distributed to the executive, legislative,
and judicial branches of state government for distribution to employees as follows: when the
fiscal year 1998 general fund ending unobligated cash balance is determined and meets the
criteria in section 1 of this Act, each full-time employee shall receive a one-time payment equal
to one percent of their current base pay.
"
Rep. Koetzle moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. de Hueck's motion to amend HB 1186.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 23, Nays 44, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 1
Yeas were:
Chicoine; Crisp; Davis; de Hueck; Duxbury; Fischer-Clemens; Gleason; Haley; Kazmerzak;
Koetzle; Kooistra; Lee; Lockner; Matthews; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald); Schrempp;
Sokolow; Sperry; Volesky; Waltman; Weber
Excused were:
Hassard; Smidt
Absent and Not Voting were:
Pederson (Gordon)
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members
present, the Speaker declared the motion lost.
The question being "Shall HB 1186 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 40, Nays 27, Excused 3, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Belatti; Brooks; Brown (Richard); Cerny; Chicoine; Cutler; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald;
Duniphan; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson
(Doug); Jorgensen; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Munson (Donald);
Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Solum; Volesky;
Weber; Wetz; Wick; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Apa; Barker; Broderick; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Collier; Crisp; de Hueck; Duxbury;
Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Konold; Lee; Lockner; Lucas; Madden; Moore;
Napoli; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sokolow; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Waltman
Excused were:
Davis; Hassard; Smidt
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the bill lost.
Rep. Richter announced his intention to reconsider the vote by which HB 1186 was lost.
Speaker Pro tempore Hunt now presiding.
The question being "Shall HB 1269 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 57, Nays 11, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Cerny;
Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Duxbury; Eccarius; Fischer-
Clemens; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson (Doug);
Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Koskan; Kredit; Lee; Lockner; Lucas; Madden; McNenny;
Monroe; Munson (Donald); Napoli; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam;
Richter; Rost; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Smidt; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Weber;
Wetz; Wick; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Barker; Collier; de Hueck; Fiegen; Konold; Kooistra; Matthews; Moore; Roe; Sokolow; Solum
Excused were:
Davis; Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1140:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to provide for the regulation of boat dealers.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1140 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Collier; Davis; Fiegen; Kazmerzak; Lockner; Sokolow; Windhorst
Excused were:
Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1298:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to define a sell-it-yourself lot.
Was read the second time.
Rep. Duniphan moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being "Shall HB 1298 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 52, Nays 15, Excused 1, Absent and Not Voting 2
Yeas were:
Apa; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Cerny;
Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Duxbury; Fischer-Clemens;
Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Gleason; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers; Jorgensen; Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra;
Koskan; Kredit; Lee; Lockner; Lucas; Madden; McNenny; Monroe; Munson (Donald); Napoli;
Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman; Schrempp;
Smidt; Solum; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Wetz; Wick
Nays were:
Collier; Davis; de Hueck; Derby; Eccarius; Fiegen; Hagen; Johnson (Doug); Kazmerzak;
Matthews; Putnam; Sokolow; Weber; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Absent and Not Voting were:
Barker; Moore
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HJR 1004:
A JOINT RESOLUTION,
Proposing and submitting to the electors at the next
general election an amendment to Article IX, section 1, of the Constitution of the State of South
Dakota, relating to the authority and responsibility of the Legislature to reorganize local
government.
Was read the second time.
Rep. Brooks moved that HJR 1004 and all amendments be laid on the table.
The question being on Rep. Brooks' motion that HJR 1004 and all amendments be laid on
the table.
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Brown (Richard); Cutler; de Hueck; Derby; Duxbury; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fitzgerald; Jorgensen;
Madden; Matthews; Peterson (Bill); Richter; Roe; Rost; Sokolow; Speaker Hagg
Excused were:
Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Napoli
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and HJR 1004 and all amendments were laid on the table.
Speaker Hagg now presiding.
HB 1096:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to permit any party in contested cases to
require the use of the Office of Hearing Examiners and to eliminate the penalty for such use.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question now being "Shall HB 1096 pass as amended?"
Nays were:
Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Richter
Excused were:
Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Lockner
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed.
The question being on the title.
Rep. de Hueck moved that the title to HB 1096 be amended as follows:
Rep. Gabriel moved that HB 1216 be placed to follow HB 1096 on today's calendar.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so placed.
HB 1216:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to repeal the inheritance tax over a period
of time.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
On page 1, line 6, after "1999" insert "2000".
On page 1, line 8, delete "2000" and insert "2001".
On page 1, line 10, delete "2001" and insert "2002".
On page 1, line 12, delete "2002" and insert "2003".
On page 1, line 14, delete "2004" and insert "2005".
On page 2, line 2, delete "2003" and insert "2004".
Rep. Lucas moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being on Rep. Windhorst's motion to amend HB 1216.
Which motion lost.
Rep. Diedrich moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question now being "Shall HB 1216 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 26, Nays 43, Excused 1, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Brown (Jarvis); Cerny; Chicoine; Collier; Crisp; Davis; Duenwald; Duxbury;
Fischer-Clemens; Gleason; Hagen; Konold; Kooistra; Lee; Lockner; Madden; Napoli;
Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Weber
Nays were:
Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Richard); Cutler; de Hueck; Derby;
Diedrich; Duniphan; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson
(Doug); Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Koskan; Kredit; Lucas; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe;
Moore; Munson (Donald); Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe;
Rost; Smidt; Sokolow; Solum; Wetz; Wick; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Rep. Konold announced his intention to reconsider the vote by which HB 1216 was lost.
Rep. Gabriel moved that the House do now recess until 8:00 p.m., which motion prevailed
and at 6:03 p.m., the House recessed.
The House reconvened at 8:00 p.m., the Speaker presiding.
HB 1099:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to prohibit a minor from purchasing,
possessing, receiving, or consuming tobacco products or from attempting to purchase or receive
tobacco products.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
"
Section 2. That
§
26-10-23
be repealed.
26-10-23.
It is a petty offense for any person under the age of eighteen to purchase, attempt
to purchase, possess or consume tobacco, cigarettes or cigars unless it is done in the immediate
presence of a parent, guardian or spouse over the age of eighteen of such minor, or to
misrepresent his age for the purpose of purchasing such tobacco, cigarettes or cigars from any
person.
Section 3. That
§
26-8B-2
be amended to read as follows:
26-8B-2.
In this chapter and chapter 26-7A, the term, child in need of supervision, means:
The question being "Shall HB 1099 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 45, Nays 20, Excused 1, Absent and Not Voting 4
Yeas were:
Apa; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Chicoine;
de Hueck; Derby; Duniphan; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Hunt;
Jaspers; Koetzle; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Lee; Lucas; Madden; Matthews; McNenny;
Monroe; Munson (Donald); Napoli; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam;
Richter; Roe; Rost; Smidt; Solum; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Wetz; Wick; Windhorst; Speaker
Hagg
Nays were:
Cerny; Collier; Crisp; Cutler; Davis; Diedrich; Duenwald; Hagen; Haley; Johnson (Doug);
Kazmerzak; Konold; Lockner; Moore; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sokolow; Sperry; Waltman;
Weber
Absent and Not Voting were:
Barker; Duxbury; Gleason; Jorgensen
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1146:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to mandate transferability of certain
postsecondary credit hours.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being on Rep. Cutler's pending motion to amend HB 1146 as found on page
420 of the House Journal.
The Speaker, being in doubt on the voice vote, requested a roll call vote.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 30, Nays 39, Excused 1, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Chicoine; Collier; Cutler; de Hueck; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Duxbury;
Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Jaspers; Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Koskan; Munson (Donald); Napoli;
Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Roe; Rost; Smidt; Solum; Sperry; Van
Gerpen; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard); Cerny; Crisp;
Davis; Derby; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Hunt; Kazmerzak;
Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra; Kredit; Lee; Lockner; Lucas; Madden; Matthews; McNenny;
Monroe; Moore; Richter; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Sokolow; Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz;
Wick
Excused were:
Hassard
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members
present, the Speaker declared the motion lost.
Rep. Broderick moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
Nays were:
Apa; Belatti; Chicoine; Collier; Cutler; de Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Jaspers;
Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Koskan; Munson (Donald); Napoli; Pummel; Roe; Schaunaman;
Sokolow; Speaker Hagg
Excused were:
Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Sperry
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
There being no objection, the House reverted to Order of Business No. 5.
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1179 and 1325 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bills do pass.
"
Section
5.
It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage telecommunications companies to
more efficiently meet the infrastructure deployment goal described in
§
§
49-31-60 to 49-31-68,
inclusive, for a fully integrated SONET backbone of interconnected survivable rings. To that
end, telecommunications companies may jointly provide facilities and enter into revenue-
pooling arrangements between and among themselves relating to the provisioning of these
facilities. Any such arrangement shall be subject to commission review and approval and, to the
extent it has received such approval, may not be construed as violating any state or local laws
governing unfair trade practices, antitrust or restraint of trade. Further, it is the intent of the
Legislature that any such approved arrangement shall be exempt from federal laws governing
unfair trade practices, antitrust, or restraint of trade. Except with respect to such joint
provisioning of facilities and revenue pooling arrangements approved by the commission, both
state and federal laws governing unfair trade practices, antitrust, and restraint of trade shall
apply with full force and effect. The joint provisioning of facilities within an arrangement
consistent with the limited purpose described in this section may not be construed as imposing
additional common carrier obligations on the participating companies. The provisions of this
section may not be construed to permit any telecommunications company to take any action that
is contrary to the public interest.
Section
6.
It is in the public interest and essential that local exchange telecommunication
companies over all of South Dakota continue to be viable providers of affordable local exchange
services. Local exchange telecommunication companies receive substantial revenue necessary
to support the exchange from a minority of their customers. Local exchange telecommunication
companies must be allowed to compete to keep their profitable customers in order to maintain
the viability of local exchanges.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 49-31, except section 4 of this Act, any
telecommunication company may grant any discounts, incentives, services, or other business
practices necessary to meet competition. Nothing in chapter 49-31 restricts or prevents
telecommunication companies from offering reduced prices and special terms and conditions
for this state, its existing instrumentalities and subdivisions, for the United States and for K
through 12 schools accredited by the secretary of the Department of Education and Cultural
Affairs.
Section
7.
That chapter 49-31 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
Section
8.
That chapter 49-31 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
the state may not be changed unless reduced by the company. The provisions of
§
49-31-4 and
§
§
49-31-21 to 49-31-12.5, inclusive, do not apply to prices for services regulated by this
section.
Section
9.
That chapter 49-31 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
Dialing parity, as defined in 47 U.S.C.
§
153 (15) as of January 1, 1998, for purposes of
intraLATA long distance telecommunications services, may not be implemented by order of the
commission until all providers of toll services are authorized to provide interLATA services
which originate in this state.
"
"
Section 31. It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage telecommunications companies
to more efficiently meet the infrastructure deployment goal described in
§
§
49-31-60 to 49-31-
68, inclusive, for a fully integrated SONET backbone of interconnected survivable rings. To that
end, telecommunications companies may jointly provide facilities and enter into revenue-
pooling arrangements between and among themselves relating to the provisioning of these
facilities. Any such arrangement shall be subject to commission review and approval and, to the
extent it has received such approval, may not be construed as violating any state or local laws
governing unfair trade practices, antitrust or restraint of trade. Further, it is the intent of the
Legislature that any such approved arrangement shall be exempt from federal laws governing
unfair trade practices, antitrust, or restraint of trade. Except with respect to such joint
provisioning of facilities and revenue pooling arrangements approved by the commission, both
state and federal laws governing unfair trade practices, antitrust, and restraint of trade shall
apply with full force and effect. The joint provisioning of facilities within an arrangement
consistent with the limited purpose described in this section may not be construed as imposing
additional common carrier obligations on the participating companies. The provisions of this
section may not be construed to permit any telecommunications company to take any action that
is contrary to the public interest.
"
"
Section 2. The unemployment compensation fund created pursuant to
§
61-4-1 shall be
used as the source of revenue to provide the extended benefits provided by this Act. The
payment of extended benefits shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 61-6.
"
Section 1. That at the next general election held in the state, the following amendment to
Section 15 of Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, as set forth in
section 2 of this Joint Resolution, which is hereby agreed to, shall be submitted to the electors
of the state for approval.
Section 2. That
§
15 of Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota be
amended to read as follows:
§
15.
The Legislature shall make such provision by general taxation and by authorizing the
school corporations to levy such additional taxes as with the income from the permanent school
fund shall secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state. The
Legislature is empowered to classify properties within school districts
into separate classes
for
purposes of school taxation
, and may constitute agricultural property a separate class
. Taxes
shall be uniform on all property in the same class.
And that as so amended said resolution do pass.
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1294 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do not pass.
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1256 and 1318 which were tabled.
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB
1017, 1138, and 1300 which were deferred to the 36th legislative day.
HCR 1014
Introduced by:
Representatives Gabriel, Belatti, Brooks, Brown (Gary), Brown
(Jarvis), Brown (Richard), Cerny, Chicoine, Collier, Crisp, Cutler, Davis, de Hueck, Derby,
Diedrich, Duenwald, Duniphan, Duxbury, Eccarius, Fiegen, Fischer-Clemens, Fitzgerald,
Gleason, Hagen, Hagg, Haley, Hassard, Hunt, Jaspers, Johnson (Doug), Jorgensen, Kazmerzak,
Koetzle, Konold, Kooistra, Koskan, Kredit, Lee, Lockner, Lucas, Madden, Matthews,
McNenny, Moore, Munson (Donald), Napoli, Pederson (Gordon), Peterson (Bill), Pummel,
Putnam, Richter, Roe, Rost, Schaunaman, Schrempp, Smidt, Sokolow, Solum, Sperry, Van
Gerpen, Volesky, Waltman, Weber, Wetz, Wick, and Windhorst and Senators Rounds, Aker,
Albers, Brosz, Brown (Arnold), Daugaard, Dennert, Drake, Dunn (Jim), Dunn (Rebecca),
Everist, Flowers, Frederick, Hainje, Halverson, Ham, Hunhoff, Hutmacher, Johnson (William),
Kleven, Kloucek, Lange, Lawler, Morford, Munson (David), Olson, Paisley, Reedy, Shoener,
Staggers, Symens, Valandra, Vitter, and Whiting
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION,
Memorializing Congress to restore the historic role of the
National Guard in America's defense policy.
Rep. Brooks moved that HB 1116 with pending amendment be laid on the table.
The question being on Rep. Brooks' motion that HB 1116 with pending amendment be laid
on the table.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 41, Nays 28, Excused 1, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Barker; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Richard); Collier; Davis; de Hueck;
Derby; Diedrich; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Jaspers;
Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra; Kredit; Lucas; Moore; Munson (Donald);
Napoli; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman; Solum;
Van Gerpen; Weber; Wetz; Wick; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Apa; Brown (Jarvis); Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler; Duenwald; Duniphan; Duxbury;
Fitzgerald; Gabriel; Hunt; Johnson (Doug); Koskan; Lee; Lockner; Madden; Matthews;
McNenny; Monroe; Pummel; Schrempp; Smidt; Sokolow; Sperry; Volesky; Waltman;
Windhorst
HB 1217:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise certain aerial hunting provisions.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1217 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 54, Nays 15, Excused 1, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler; de Hueck;
Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duxbury; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Fitzgerald; Gabriel;
Gleason; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Konold; Koskan; Kredit; Lee;
Lockner; Lucas; Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald); Napoli;
Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Rost; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Smidt; Sokolow; Solum; Sperry;
Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wick; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Belatti; Broderick; Brown (Richard); Collier; Davis; Duniphan; Hagen; Haley; Koetzle;
Kooistra; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Roe; Van Gerpen; Volesky
Excused were:
Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1221:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to define and regulate a qualified education
loan insurer, to provide for the investment of certain funds, to allow surety student loan
insurance, and to declare an emergency.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1221 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Collier; Duenwald; Peterson (Bill); Schrempp
Excused were:
Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Rep. Gabriel moved that the House do now recess until 9:20 p.m., which motion prevailed
and at 8:56 p.m., the House recessed.
The House reconvened at 9:20 p.m. the Speaker presiding.
Rep. Fiegen moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being "Shall HB 1263 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Brown (Gary); Cutler; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Fiegen; Johnson (Doug); Konold;
Koskan; Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Napoli; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill);
Pummel; Rost; Solum; Van Gerpen; Wick; Windhorst
Excused were:
Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1313:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to allow an owner, operator, or manager of
a cemetery to apply for a disinterment permit.
Having had its second reading was up for reconsideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall HB 1313 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Kazmerzak; Munson (Donald); Pederson (Gordon); Sokolow; Waltman
Excused were:
Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1315:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise certain provisions relating to
comparative negligence.
Was read the second time.
Rep. Hunt moved that HB 1315 be deferred until Thursday, February 12th, the 23rd
legislative day.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so deferred.
HB 1329:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to make an appropriation from the
coordinated soil and water conservation fund to the State Conservation Commission.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1329 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Nays were:
Broderick
Excused were:
Fitzgerald; Hassard
Absent and Not Voting were:
Koskan
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1330:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to make an appropriation for adult basic
education.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1330 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 67, Nays 1, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard);
Cerny; Chicoine; Collier; Crisp; Cutler; Davis; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan;
Duxbury; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Gabriel; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers;
Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Lee;
Lockner; Lucas; Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald); Napoli;
Pederson (Gordon); Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman;
Schrempp; Smidt; Sokolow; Solum; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz;
Wick; Windhorst; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
de Hueck
HB 1237:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the property tax levies for the
general fund of a school district.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1237 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 66, Nays 2, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Brown (Richard);
Cerny; Chicoine; Crisp; Cutler; Davis; de Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan;
Duxbury; Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Gabriel; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers;
Johnson (Doug); Jorgensen; Koetzle; Konold; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Lee; Lockner; Lucas;
Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Monroe; Moore; Munson (Donald); Napoli; Pederson (Gordon);
Peterson (Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Smidt;
Sokolow; Solum; Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wick; Windhorst;
Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Collier; Kazmerzak
Excused were:
Fitzgerald; Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1214:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to require continuation and conversion of
health care coverage when an employer ceases operations.
Was read the second time.
"
Section 11. Nothing in this Act is enforceable to the extent such enforcement violates the
Employer Retirement Income Security Act.
"
The question being "Shall HB 1214 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 64, Nays 4, Excused 2, Absent and Not Voting 0
Yeas were:
Apa; Barker; Belatti; Broderick; Brooks; Brown (Gary); Brown (Jarvis); Cerny; Chicoine;
Collier; Crisp; Cutler; Davis; de Hueck; Derby; Diedrich; Duenwald; Duniphan; Duxbury;
Eccarius; Fiegen; Fischer-Clemens; Gabriel; Gleason; Hagen; Haley; Hunt; Jaspers; Johnson
(Doug); Jorgensen; Kazmerzak; Koetzle; Kooistra; Koskan; Kredit; Lee; Lockner; Lucas;
Madden; Matthews; McNenny; Moore; Munson (Donald); Napoli; Pederson (Gordon); Peterson
(Bill); Pummel; Putnam; Richter; Roe; Rost; Schaunaman; Schrempp; Smidt; Sokolow; Solum;
Sperry; Van Gerpen; Volesky; Waltman; Weber; Wetz; Wick; Speaker Hagg
Nays were:
Brown (Richard); Konold; Monroe; Windhorst
Excused were:
Fitzgerald; Hassard
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 92:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise certain provisions regarding the
recording of a social security number for the purposes of driver licensing.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on State Affairs.
SB 156:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to allow an administrator to dispose of certain
items without a formal motion of the governing body.
SB 161:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to appropriate money for the Northern Crops
Institute.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
SB 218:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to provide for a Limited Liability Company
Act.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
SB 228:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to provide certain requirements for new
continuing care retirement communities.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services.
SB 235:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to prevent criminals from suing their victims
for damages.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
SB 236:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise certain provisions regarding trusts
and estates.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
SB 239:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to impose legal responsibility and tort liability
for environmental damages caused by the negligent entrustment of livestock to another or
negligent control or specification of design, construction, or operational instruction of livestock
facilities.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Rep. Gabriel moved that SB 57 and 3 be deferred until Thursday, February 12th, the 23rd
legislative day.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Office of Engrossing
and Enrolling has carefully compared HB 1008, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1060, 1061,
1062,
1064, 1077, 1141, 1167, 1204, 1209, and 1239 and finds the same correctly enrolled.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that HB 1007 was delivered
to his Excellency, the Governor, for his approval at 3:15 p.m., February 11, 1998.
The Speaker publicly read the title to
HB 1008:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the requirements for using an
absentee ballot.
HB 1054:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the definition of consanguinity and
affinity in challenges for cause in jury trials.
HB 1055:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the membership of the judicial
conference.
HB 1056:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the procedure to fix a new time
period for execution of a death sentence if the time period established by the original warrant
of execution has passed.
HB 1057:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the method of compiling the
driver's license list for purposes of jury selection.
HB 1058:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise certain statutes relating to jury
districts.
Rep. Jaspers moved that the House do now adjourn, which motion prevailed, and at 10:15
p.m. the House adjourned.