The prayer was offered by the Chaplain, Pastor Ruth Ann Loughry, followed by the Pledge
of Allegiance led by House page Heather Amdahl.
Roll Call: All members present.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Chief Clerk of the
House has had under consideration the House Journal of the thirty-fifth day.
All errors, typographical or otherwise, are duly marked in the temporary journal for
correction.
And we hereby move the adoption of the report.
The Honorable Matthew J.W. Michels
Speaker of the House
State Capitol
Pierre, SD 57501-5070
Dear Speaker Michels and Members of the House:
I herewith return House Bill 1100 and VETO the same. It is "An Act to exempt swine and cattle
semen from sales and use tax." I am vetoing this bill for the same reasons I vetoed House Bill
1181.
There is a significant difference between providing partial tax incentives that will create new
tax revenues in South Dakota and providing total tax exemptions that benefit only certain small
groups of people.
When I propose tax incentives for new and expanding businesses, such as HB 1261 and HB1262
this year, I propose only partial tax relief and that partial relief is proposed only because it will
result in new jobs being created and new taxes being paid if the companies build or expand in
South Dakota.
Unfortunately, HB 1100 would provide a total tax exemption for only certain items sold by a
small group of people. It will therefore give these people a special benefit that other groups of
service providers and commodity sellers don't have.
The total tax exemption in HB 1100 will not cause any great new investments or new jobs in
our state and will not create any new, significant increases in other tax revenues. It will simply
reduce the amount of revenues available to provide needed services to our students, our elderly,
the poor and the sick, and to provide property tax relief.
It also has another effect. When the Legislature gives total tax exemptions to small groups one
at a time, it is inviting many more future requests for special exemptions by dozens of small
groups of people. Each of these groups sincerely believe they are unique, special and deserving
of special treatment that should allow them to avoid paying taxes.
Some proponents of these total tax exemptions on certain items or for an individual small group
of taxpayers argue that we collect only a small amount of tax on each item or from each group.
However, added together, all of these candidates for special exemptions amount to many
millions of dollars. For example, the state collects taxes in thousands of categories of taxpayers.
The smallest 438 categories account for over $12 million in state sales taxes and $4.5 million
in city sales taxes.
What will the Legislature say when many or most of them come to Pierre over the next few years and ask for a special tax exemption like the one given in HB 1100?
Giving total tax exemptions to small groups of people also creates a special, privileged class of
people who escape the taxes that everyone else is paying.
Total tax exemptions are not good because everyone should pay a little so that everyone else
doesn't have to pay a lot. To keep our tax rates low, we must have broad-based and wide-spread
application of our sales and use taxes.
South Dakota consistently ranks at or near the bottom in the amount of taxes we take from our
residents to fund government services. Our broad-based sales tax system helps keep our taxes
per person low. HB 1100 narrows our sales tax base and its passage encourages additional
narrowing of our tax base.
Taxes work best when everyone fairly shares the tax burden that provides services to keep our
state a great place to live, work and raise a family.
Preserving the existing tax base is also the best way to make sure we have enough revenues to
meet our people's needs now and, hopefully, have enough money in the future to provide
additional tax reductions for everyone.
In 1995, when the Legislature initiated the first steps of the 30% property tax reduction, sales
taxes were broadened and exemptions eliminated so that we would have enough money in future
years to continue property tax reductions. Exempting certain items from sales tax and
exempting certain groups of people from paying sales taxes makes one wonder, "Is property tax
relief still important to the Legislature?"
I believe that maintaining our current property tax reductions and working to provide even more
property tax reductions for as many taxpayers as possible in the future are very, very important
and respectfully request that you concur with my veto of HB 1100.
Sincerely,
M. Michael Rounds
Cc: The Honorable Chris Nelson
The Honorable Dennis Daugaard
The Honorable Matthew J.W. Michels
Speaker of the House
State Capitol
Pierre, SD 57501-5070
Dear Speaker Michels and Members of the House:
I herewith return House Bill 1181 and VETO the same. It is "An Act to exempt certain amateur
sports officials from sales tax."
There is a significant difference between providing partial tax incentives that will create new
tax revenues in South Dakota and providing total tax exemptions that benefit only certain small
groups of people.
When I propose tax incentives for new and expanding businesses, such as HB 1261 and HB1262
this year, I propose only partial tax relief and that partial relief is proposed only because it will
result in new jobs being created and new taxes being paid if the companies build or expand in
South Dakota.
Unfortunately, HB 1181 would provide a total tax exemption for certain amateur sports
officials. It will therefore give these people a special benefit that other groups of service
providers don't have.
The total tax exemption in HB 1181 will not cause any great new investments or new jobs in
our state and will not create any new, significant increases in other tax revenues. It will simply
reduce the amount of revenues available to provide needed services to our students, our elderly,
the poor and the sick, and to provide property tax relief.
It also has another effect. When the Legislature gives total tax exemptions to small groups one
at a time, it is inviting many more future requests for special exemptions by dozens of small
groups of people. Each of these groups sincerely believe they are unique, special and deserving
of special treatment that should allow them to avoid paying taxes.
Some proponents of these tax exemptions on certain items or for an individual small group of
taxpayers argue that we collect only a small amount of tax on each item or from each group.
However, added together, all of these candidates for special exemptions amount to many
millions of dollars. For example, the state collects taxes in thousands of categories of taxpayers.
The smallest 438 categories account for over $12 million in state sales taxes and $4.5 million
in city sales taxes.
What will the Legislature say when many or most of them come to Pierre over the next few
years and ask for a special tax exemption like the one given in HB 1181?
Giving out these special exemptions on certain items or for certain groups every year will reduce our ability to give tax relief to everyone in the future because our broad sales tax base becomes smaller and smaller every time one of these total tax exemptions becomes law.
Total tax exemptions are not good because everyone should pay a little so that everyone else
doesn't have to pay a lot. To keep our tax rates low, we must have broad-based and wide-spread
application of our sales and use taxes.
South Dakota consistently ranks at or near the bottom in the amount of taxes we take from our
residents to fund government services. Our broad-based sales tax system helps keep our taxes
per person low. HB 1181 narrows our sales tax base and its passage encourages additional
narrowing of our tax base.
Taxes work best when everyone fairly shares the tax burden that provides services to keep our
state a great place to live, work and raise a family.
Preserving the existing tax base is also the best way to make sure we have enough revenues to
meet our people's needs now and, hopefully, have enough money in the future to provide
additional tax reductions for everyone.
In 1995, when the Legislature initiated the first steps of the 30% property tax reduction, sales
taxes were broadened and exemptions eliminated so that we would have enough money in future
years to continue property tax reductions. Exempting certain items from sales tax and
exempting certain groups of people from paying sales taxes makes one wonder, "Is property tax
relief still important to the Legislature?"
I believe that maintaining our current property tax reductions and working to provide even more
property tax reductions for as many taxpayers as possible in the future are very, very important
and respectfully request that you concur with my veto of HB 1181.
Sincerely,
M. Michael Rounds
Cc: The Honorable Chris Nelson
The Honorable Dennis Daugaard
The Honorable Matthew J.W. Michels
Speaker of the House
State Capitol
Pierre, SD 57501-5070
Dear Speaker Michels and Members of the House:
I herewith return House Bill 1210 and VETO the same. It is "An Act to exempt certain contract services from sales and use taxes." I am vetoing this bill for the same reasons I vetoed House Bill 1181 and House Bill 1100.
When I propose tax incentives for new and expanding businesses, such as HB 1261 and HB1262
this year, I propose only partial tax relief and that partial relief is proposed only because it will
result in new jobs being created and new taxes being paid if the companies build or expand in
South Dakota.
Unfortunately, HB 1210 would provide a total tax exemption for only certain services sold by
a small group of people. It will therefore give these people a special benefit that other groups
of service providers and commodity sellers don't have.
The total tax exemption in HB 1210 will not cause any great new investments or new jobs in
our state and will not create any new, significant increases in other tax revenues. It will simply
reduce the amount of revenues available to provide needed services to our students, our elderly,
the poor and the sick, and to provide property tax relief.
It also has another effect. When the Legislature gives total tax exemptions to small groups one
at a time, it is inviting many more future requests for special exemptions by dozens of small
groups of people. Each of these groups sincerely believes they are unique, special and deserving
of special treatment that should allow them to avoid paying taxes.
Some proponents of these total tax exemptions on certain items or for an individual small group
of taxpayers argue that we collect only a small amount of tax on each item or from each group.
However, added together, all of these candidates for special exemptions amount to many
millions of dollars. For example, the state collects taxes in thousands of categories of taxpayers.
The smallest 438 categories account for over $12 million in state sales taxes and $4.5 million
in city sales taxes.
What will the Legislature say when many or most of them come to Pierre over the next few
years and ask for a special tax exemption like the one given in HB 1210?
Giving out these special exemptions on certain items or for certain groups every year will reduce
our ability to give tax relief to everyone in the future because our broad sales tax base becomes
smaller and smaller every time one of these total tax exemptions becomes law.
Giving total tax exemptions to small groups of people also creates a special, privileged class of
people who escape the taxes that everyone else is paying.
Total tax exemptions are not good because everyone should pay a little so that everyone else
doesn't have to pay a lot. To keep our tax rates low, we must have broad-based and wide-spread
application of our sales and use taxes.
South Dakota consistently ranks at or near the bottom in the amount of taxes we take from our residents to fund government services. Our broad-based sales tax system helps keep our taxes per person low. HB 1210 narrows our sales tax base and its passage encourages additional narrowing of our tax base.
Preserving the existing tax base is also the best way to make sure we have enough revenues to
meet our people's needs now and, hopefully, have enough money in the future to provide
additional tax reductions for everyone.
In 1995, when the Legislature initiated the first steps of the 30% property tax reduction, sales
taxes were broadened and exemptions eliminated so that we would have enough money in future
years to continue property tax reductions. Exempting certain items from sales tax and
exempting certain groups of people from paying sales taxes makes one wonder, "Is property tax
relief still important to the Legislature?"
I believe that maintaining our current property tax reductions and working to provide even more
property tax reductions for as many taxpayers as possible in the future are very, very important
and respectfully request that you concur with my veto of HB 1210.
Sincerely,
M. Michael Rounds
Cc: The Honorable Chris Nelson
The Honorable Dennis Daugaard
I have the honor to return herewith HB 1005, 1025, 1051, 1142, 1158, 1166, 1215, 1245,
1249, and HJR 1001 which have passed the Senate without change.
I have the honor to return herewith HB 1042, 1093, 1139, 1152, 1202, 1222, 1233, 1240,
and 1248 which have been amended by the Senate and your concurrence in the amendments is
respectfully requested.
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Senate has appointed Sens. Apa,
Bartling, and Earley as a committee of three on the part of the Senate to meet with a like
committee on the part of the House to adjust the differences between the two houses on
HB 1028.
I have the honor to return herewith HCR 1016 in which the Senate has concurred.
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Senate has adopted the report of
the Conference Committee on SB 96.
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Senate has concurred in House
amendments to SB 66 and 222.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Senate has failed to concur in
House amendments to SB 214 and no committee was appointed.
Rep. Dykstra moved that a committee of three on the part of the House be appointed to
meet with a like committee on the part of Senate to adjust the differences between the two
houses on SB 214.
Which motion prevailed and
the Speaker appointed as such committee Reps. Dykstra,
McCoy, and Hargens.
Rep. Dykstra moved that the House do concur in Senate amendments to HB 1095.
The question being on Rep. Dykstra's motion that the House do concur in Senate
amendments to HB 1095.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 65, Nays 4, Excused 1, Absent 0
Nays:
Buckingham; Elliott; Frost; O'Brien
Excused:
Garnos
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and the amendments were concurred in.
Rep. Murschel moved that the House do concur in Senate amendments to HB 1203.
The question being on Rep. Murschel's motion that the House do concur in Senate
amendments to HB 1203.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 69, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra;
Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley;
Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt;
Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles;
Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen;
Speaker Michels
Excused:
Valandra
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and the amendments were concurred in.
HCR 1018: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Requesting South Dakota's Congressional delegation and the United States Congress to support federal multi-emission reduction legislation.
The question being on Rep. Hackl's motion that HCR 1018 be adopted.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 69, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra; Elliott; Faehn;
Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley; Halverson; Hanks;
Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt;
Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Nelson;
Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden;
Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville;
Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Excused:
Bradford
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and HCR 1018 was adopted.
HCR 1019:
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION,
Setting forth certain legislative policy
recommendations to the secretary of the Department of Game, Fish and Parks regarding ongoing
efforts to improve communications and to resolve complaints among landowners, sportsmen,
and the department.
Rep. Brunner moved that HCR 1019 as found on pages 686 and 687 of the House Journal
be adopted.
The question being on Rep. Brunner's motion that HCR 1019 be adopted.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 70, Nays 0, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra;
Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley;
Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt;
Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles;
Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick;
Willadsen; Speaker Michels
HCR 1020
Introduced by:
Representatives Lange, Gillespie, Haley, Hargens, Kroger,
Miles, Roberts, Sigdestad, Street, Thompson, and Van Norman and Senators Moore, Bartling,
Hanson (Gary), Hundstad, Kloucek, Koetzle, Peterson (Jim), Sutton (Dan), and Two Bulls
Was read the first time and the Speaker waived the committee referral.
Rep. Schafer moved that the report of the Conference Committee on SB 96 as found on
page 680 of the House Journal be adopted.
The question being on Rep. Schafer's motion that the report of the Conference Committee
on SB 96 be adopted.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 68, Nays 2, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra; Elliott; Faehn;
Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley; Halverson; Hanks;
Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt;
Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup;
O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts;
Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville;
Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Buckingham; McCoy
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the motion carried and the report was adopted.
Rep. Rhoden moved that the reports of the Standing Committees on
Judiciary on SB 67 as found on pages 676 to 678 of the House Journal
; also
Judiciary on SB 183 as found on pages 678 and 679 of the House Journal
; also
Appropriations on SB 218 as found on pages 679 and 680 of the House Journal be adopted.
Which motion prevailed and the reports were adopted.
SB 144:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
limit the personal liability of persons in
professional corporations and limited liability companies.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 144 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 70, Nays 0, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra;
Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley;
Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt;
Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles;
Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick;
Willadsen; Speaker Michels
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 58:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
require insurers to cooperate with the
Department of Social Services in the coordination of medical benefits.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall SB 58 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 70, Nays 0, Excused 0, Absent 0
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Rep. Rhoden moved that SB 72, 185, and 157 be placed to follow SB 218 on today's
calendar.
Which motion prevailed and the bills were so placed.
SB 197:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
clarify how certain registered livestock
brands held in joint tenancy may be transferred.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall SB 197 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 26, Nays 44, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Brunner; Cutler; Davis; Dennert; Elliott; Fryslie; Garnos; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Haley;
Halverson; Hargens; Hennies; Howie; Jensen; Kroger; Lange; Miles; Pederson (Gordon);
Roberts; Schafer; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Valandra
Nays:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Buckingham; Deadrick; Dykstra; Faehn; Frost; Gassman; Hackl;
Hanks; Haverly; Heineman; Hills; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs;
McCoy; McLaughlin; Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Rounds; Sebert; Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Van Etten; Van
Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill lost.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 98 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 64, Nays 5, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Elliott; Faehn; Fryslie;
Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly;
Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus;
Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien;
Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds;
Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Van Etten;
Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Boomgarden; Frost; Haley; Valandra; Van Norman
Excused:
Dykstra
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 36:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
authorize the Board of Regents to accept a
gift of property from the South Dakota State University Foundation.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 36 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 69, Nays 1, Excused 0, Absent 0
Nays:
Buckingham
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 220:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
establish the South Dakota Certified beef
program, to create the South Dakota Certified beef fund, and to declare an emergency.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 220 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 70, Nays 0, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra;
Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley;
Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt;
Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles;
Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick;
Willadsen; Speaker Michels
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Rep. Rhoden moved that SB 170 be placed to follow SB 157 on today's calendar.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so placed.
Which motion prevailed and the bill was so placed.
SB 35:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
authorize the Board of Regents to construct
a replacement manager's dwelling at the Cottonwood Research Station, to dispose of the
existing dwelling on this site, and to make an appropriation therefor.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 35 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 70, Nays 0, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra;
Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley;
Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt;
Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles;
Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick;
Willadsen; Speaker Michels
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the members-
elect, the Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 210:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the conditions under which the state
may enter into gaming compacts with Indian tribes.
Was read the second time.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 38, Nays 32, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Frost; Hackl; Hanks;
Heineman; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; McCoy;
McLaughlin; Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; Olson (Ryan); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave;
Rhoden; Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick
Nays:
Bradford; Dennert; Elliott; Faehn; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Haley;
Halverson; Hargens; Haverly; Hennies; Jensen; Kroger; Lange; Miles; O'Brien; Pederson
(Gordon); Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Valandra; Van
Norman; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members present,
the Speaker declared the motion carried.
Rep. Rhoden moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being "Shall SB 210 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 23, Nays 47, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Buckingham; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Hackl; Hanks; Heineman; Hills; Howie; Hunt; Klaudt;
Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Nelson; Novstrup; Olson (Ryan); Rave; Rhoden; Turbiville; Van
Etten; Weems; Wick
Nays:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Cutler; Dennert; Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos;
Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Haley; Halverson; Hargens; Haverly; Hennies; Hunhoff;
Jensen; Jerke; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; O'Brien; Pederson
(Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street;
Thompson; Tidemann; Tornow; Valandra; Van Norman; Vehle; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill lost.
Was read the second time.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Van Etten's motion that SB 43 be amended.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 24, Nays 46, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Brunner; Buckingham; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Hackl; Hanks; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke;
Koistinen; Krebs; McCoy; Nelson; Novstrup; Olson (Ryan); Rave; Tornow; Van Etten; Vehle;
Weems; Wick; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Bradford; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra; Elliott; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie;
Glenski; Glover; Haley; Halverson; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie;
Hunhoff; Klaudt; Kraus; Kroger; Lange; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; O'Brien; Pederson
(Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad;
Street; Thompson; Tidemann; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Norman; Willadsen
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members
present, the Speaker declared the motion lost.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 61, Nays 9, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra; Elliott; Faehn;
Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Glenski; Glover; Haley; Halverson; Haverly; Heineman;
Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange;
McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tidemann;
Tornow; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen;
Speaker Michels
Nays:
Brunner; Gillespie; Hackl; Hanks; Hargens; Klaudt; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Rave
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 67:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain drug and alcohol offenses,
driving offenses, and other felonious offenses.
Was read the second time.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Tornow's motion that SB 67 be amended.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 25, Nays 45, Excused 0, Absent 0
Nays:
Bradford; Cutler; Deadrick; Dennert; Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie;
Glenski; Glover; Haley; Halverson; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie;
Hunhoff; Klaudt; Kraus; Kroger; Lange; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; O'Brien; Peters;
Putnam; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tidemann;
Turbiville; Valandra; Van Norman; Vehle; Willadsen
So the motion not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members
present, the Speaker declared the motion lost.
The question being "Shall SB 67 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 58, Nays 12, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Buckingham; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra; Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie;
Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Haley; Halverson; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies;
Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Lange; McCoy;
McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave;
Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville;
Valandra; Van Etten; Van Norman; Vehle; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Brunner; Cutler; Davis; Hackl; Hanks; Hargens; Klaudt; Kroger; Olson (Ryan); Pederson
(Gordon); Rhoden; Weems
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
There being no objection, the House reverted to Order of Business No. 6.
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Senate has appointed Sens. Kelly,
Peterson, and Tom Hansen as a committee of three on the part of the Senate to meet with a like
committee on the part of the House to adjust the differences between the two houses on SB 214.
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that HB 1140 was lost on second reading
and final passage.
Rep. Rhoden moved that the House do now recess until 5:00 p.m., which motion prevailed
and at 4:11 p.m., the House recessed.
The House reconvened at 5:00 p.m., the Speaker presiding.
Rep. Rhoden moved that when we adjourn today, we adjourn to convene at 11:30 a.m. on
Wednesday, March 2nd, the 37th legislative day.
Which motion prevailed.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 183 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 63, Nays 7, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Dennert; Dykstra; Elliott; Faehn;
Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley; Halverson; Hargens;
Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen;
Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan);
Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Schafer; Sebert;
Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tidemann; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems;
Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Deadrick; Hanks; McCoy; Nelson; Rounds; Tornow; Van Norman
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 6 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 61, Nays 9, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Elliott;
Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Halverson; Hanks;
Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt;
Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Nelson;
Novstrup; Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Schafer; Sebert;
Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tornow; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick;
Willadsen
Nays:
Dennert; Haley; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Roberts; Rounds; Tidemann; Van Norman; Speaker
Michels
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 218:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
create the South Dakota Energy
Infrastructure Authority, to make an appropriation therefor, and to declare an emergency.
Was read the second time.
Rep. Frost moved that SB 218 be laid on the table.
The question being on Rep. Frost's motion that SB 218 be laid on the table.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 67, Nays 3, Excused 0, Absent 0
Nays:
Glenski; Hackl; Street
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and SB 218 was tabled.
SB 72:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
include legal costs as allowable expenditures
from the special education fund.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question being "Shall SB 72 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 69, Nays 1, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Dykstra;
Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley;
Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt;
Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; Lange; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles;
Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam;
Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker
Michels
Nays:
Van Norman
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 185:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the calculation of a school district
excess general fund balance.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 33, Nays 37, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Dennert; Elliott; Frost; Fryslie; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover;
Hackl; Haley; Halverson; Hargens; Hennies; Hills; Jensen; Kroger; Lange; Miles; Murschel;
Novstrup; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Roberts; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Tornow;
Turbiville; Valandra; Van Norman; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Faehn; Garnos; Hanks; Haverly;
Heineman; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; McCoy;
McLaughlin; Nelson; O'Brien; Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Rounds; Schafer;
Sebert; Tidemann; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill lost.
SB 157:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
increase the per student allocation in the
state aid to education formula and to exempt from reversion certain funds appropriated for the
state aid to education formula.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
"
Section 1. The Department of Education is hereby directed to undertake a study of the
allocation of state funds to the various public school districts.
Section 2. The study shall include consideration of the following factors:
Section 4. The Department of Education shall provide an interim report to the Legislature
no later than December 1, 2005. The interim report shall include preliminary findings regarding
sparse schools, and a final report shall follow no later than December 1, 2006.
Section 5. That
§
13-13-10.1
be amended to read as follows:
13-13-10.1.
Terms used in this chapter mean:
13-13-73.
The secretary of the Department of Education shall compute state aid to education
for each school district under the foundation program according to the following calculations:
Rep. Rhoden moved that Rep. Hargens' substitute motion to amend SB 157 be laid on the
table.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Rhoden's motion that Rep. Hargens' substitute motion to amend SB 157 be laid on the table.
Yeas 50, Nays 19, Excused 1, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie;
Garnos; Hackl; Hanks; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen;
Jerke; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; McCoy; McLaughlin; Murschel; Nelson; Novstrup;
O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Rounds;
Schafer; Sebert; Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Willadsen; Speaker
Michels
Nays:
Bradford; Dennert; Elliott; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Haley; Halverson; Hargens;
Kroger; Lange; Miles; Roberts; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson; Valandra; Van Norman
Excused:
Wick
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members present,
the Speaker declared the motion carried and Rep. Hargens' substitute motion to amend SB 157
was tabled.
The question being on Rep. Dykstra's motion that SB 157 be amended.
Which motion prevailed and SB 157 was so amended.
Rep. Rhoden moved that Rep. Hargens' motion to further amend SB 157 be laid on the
table.
A roll call vote was requested and supported.
The question being on Rep. Rhoden's motion that Rep. Hargens' motion to further amend
SB 157 be laid on the table.
And the roll being called:
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Faehn; Frost; Garnos;
Hanks; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen; Jerke; Klaudt;
Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; McCoy; McLaughlin; Murschel; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan);
Pederson (Gordon); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert;
Tidemann; Tornow; Turbiville; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Bradford; Dennert; Elliott; Fryslie; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Hackl; Haley;
Halverson; Hargens; Kroger; Lange; Miles; Nelson; Roberts; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Valandra; Van Norman
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members present,
the Speaker declared the motion carried and Rep. Hargens' motion to further amend SB 157 was
tabled.
Rep. Rhoden moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being "Shall SB 157 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 39, Nays 31, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Faehn; Frost; Hanks; Haverly;
Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jerke; Kraus; Krebs; McCoy; McLaughlin;
Murschel; Novstrup; O'Brien; Peters; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Rounds; Schafer; Tidemann;
Tornow; Turbiville; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Boomgarden; Bradford; Dennert; Elliott; Fryslie; Garnos; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover;
Hackl; Haley; Halverson; Hargens; Jensen; Klaudt; Koistinen; Kroger; Lange; Miles; Nelson;
Olson (Ryan); Pederson (Gordon); Putnam; Roberts; Sebert; Sigdestad; Street; Thompson;
Valandra; Van Norman
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed.
The question being on the title.
SB 170:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the index factor for determining the
per student allocation for school districts.
Was read the second time.
Rep. Rhoden moved that SB 170 be laid on the table.
The question being on Rep. Rhoden's motion that SB 170 be laid on the table.
And the roll being called:
Yeas 47, Nays 23, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Boomgarden; Brunner; Buckingham; Cutler; Davis; Deadrick; Dykstra; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie;
Garnos; Hackl; Hanks; Haverly; Heineman; Hennies; Hills; Howie; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jensen;
Klaudt; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; McCoy; McLaughlin; Murschel; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson
(Ryan); Peters; Putnam; Rausch; Rave; Rhoden; Rounds; Sebert; Tidemann; Tornow;
Turbiville; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
Nays:
Bradford; Dennert; Elliott; Gassman; Gillespie; Glenski; Glover; Haley; Halverson; Hargens;
Jerke; Kroger; Lange; Miles; Nelson; Pederson (Gordon); Roberts; Schafer; Sigdestad; Street;
Thompson; Valandra; Van Norman
So the motion having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the motion carried and SB 170 was tabled.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that HB 1018, 1049, 1052,
1053, 1056, 1150, 1214, and 1234 were delivered to his Excellency, the Governor, for his
approval at 10:55 a.m., March 1, 2005.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that HB 1118, 1154, 1160,
1194, and 1244 were delivered to his Excellency, the Governor, for his approval at 12:30 p.m.,
March 1, 2005.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Office of Engrossing
and Enrolling has carefully compared HB 1005, 1025, 1051, 1095, 1142, 1158, 1166, 1203,
1215, 1245, 1249, and HJR 1001 and finds the same correctly enrolled.
The Speaker publicly read the title to
HB 1005:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for the deposit and appropriation
of certain federal reimbursements.
HB 1025:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
authorize the South Dakota Building
Authority and the Board of Regents to implement the long-term capital project request of the
Board of Regents, providing for the construction, remodeling, or renovation of various
structures on the campuses of the state's universities and the School for the Deaf, to make
appropriations therefor, and to repeal certain previous capital project authorizations.
HB 1051:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
authorize the South Dakota Building
Authority to provide for the construction, reconstruction, renovation, and modernization of fish
hatchery facilities and infrastructure at Blue Dog State Fish Hatchery at Blue Dog Lake,
Cleghorn State Fish Hatchery at Rapid City, and McNenny Fish Hatchery at Spearfish for the
Department of Game, Fish and Parks.
HB 1095:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for a drug screening program for
certain facilities providing patient or resident care or supervision.
HB 1142:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide sales and use tax refunds to
certain fabricators.
HB 1158:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
appropriate funds to provide cochlear
implants to certain children.
HB 1166:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
establish certain legislative findings
pertaining to the health and rights of women, to revise the physician disclosure requirements to
be made to a woman contemplating submitting to an abortion, and to provide for certain causes
of action for professional negligence if an abortion is performed without informed consent.
HB 1203:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain provisions regarding the
distribution of the tax imposed on financial institutions.
HB 1215:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
make appropriations from the water and
environment fund, the environment and natural resources fee fund, the water pollution control
revolving fund subfund, and the drinking water revolving fund subfund for various water and
environmental purposes, and to declare an emergency.
HB 1245:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain provisions regarding the
use of automated external defibrillators.
HB 1249:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
prohibit the performance of abortions,
except to save the life of the mother, and to provide a penalty therefor and to provide for a
delayed effective date.
HJR 1001: A JOINT RESOLUTION, Proposing and submitting to the electors at the next
general election an amendment to Article XXI of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota,
relating to the definition of marriage.
SB 2:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the procedure for assessing certain
agricultural property.
SB 53:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for adequate access to health care
provider networks.
SB 66:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide certain options to school boards in
reorganization and to declare an emergency.
SB 114:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
establish a refundable checkoff on pulse
crops.
SB 125:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
exempt transfers of funds from certain
municipal revenue producing ventures from the calculation of the general fund balance of school
districts.
SB 154:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
exempt certain entities from the lending
license fees and surety bond requirements and bank franchise taxes.
SB 175:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for the removal of certain
noncommercial motor vehicle license plates from a motor vehicle if the ownership of the vehicle
is transferred and to make an appropriation to provide for the administration thereof.
SB 188:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the General Appropriations Act for
fiscal year 2005 for education enhancement.
SB 217:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise certain cross references in the code
with regard to the implementation of the South Dakota Business Corporation Act and to provide
for an exception to the repealers.
SB 222:
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
provide for the appropriation and
distribution of the excise tax on the gross receipts of personal communications system, wireless,
and cellular companies, to retroactively apply the appropriations and distribution of the excise
tax, and to declare an emergency.
And signed the same in the presence of the House.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that HB 1005, 1025, 1051,
1142, 1158, 1166, 1215, 1245, and 1249 were delivered to his Excellency, the Governor, for his
approval at 3:15 p.m., March 1, 2005.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that HJR 1001 was delivered
to his Excellency, the Secretary of State, for filing at 3:15 p.m., March 1, 2005.
HC 1029
Introduced by:
Representatives Miles, Cutler, Glenski, Heineman, Hunt, Krebs,
Murschel, Peters, Roberts, Thompson, Tornow, Weems, Wick, and Willadsen and Senators
Koetzle, Abdallah, Dempster, Earley, Gant, Kelly, and Knudson
HC 1030
Introduced by:
Representatives Van Norman, Bradford, Davis, Deadrick, Garnos,
Gassman, Glover, Haley, McCoy, Putnam, Rave, Rounds, Thompson, Turbiville, and Valandra
and Senators Adelstein, Bartling, Dempster, Gray, and Two Bulls
HC 1031
Introduced by:
Representatives Hargens, Boomgarden, Bradford, Brunner,
Buckingham, Davis, Deadrick, Dennert, Dykstra, Elliott, Faehn, Frost, Fryslie, Garnos,
Gassman, Gillespie, Glenski, Glover, Hackl, Haley, Halverson, Hanks, Haverly, Heineman,
Hennies, Hills, Howie, Hunhoff, Hunt, Jensen, Jerke, Klaudt, Koistinen, Kraus, Krebs, Kroger,
Lange, McCoy, McLaughlin, Miles, Murschel, Nelson, Novstrup, O'Brien, Olson (Ryan),
Pederson (Gordon), Peters, Putnam, Rausch, Rave, Rhoden, Roberts, Rounds, Schafer, Sebert,
Sigdestad, Street, Thompson, Tidemann, Tornow, Turbiville, Valandra, Van Etten, Van
Norman, Vehle, Weems, Wick, and Willadsen and Senators Moore, Abdallah, Adelstein, Apa,
Bartling, Bogue, Broderick, Dempster, Duenwald, Duniphan, Earley, Gant, Gray, Greenfield,
Hansen (Tom), Hanson (Gary), Hundstad, Kelly, Knudson, Koetzle, Kooistra, Lintz,
McCracken, McNenny, Napoli, Nesselhuf, Olson (Ed), Peterson (Jim), Schoenbeck, Smidt,
Sutton (Dan), Sutton (Duane), and Two Bulls
HC 1032
Introduced by:
Representative Haley and Senator Koetzle
Rep. Pederson moved that the House do now adjourn, which motion prevailed and at
7:32 p.m. the House adjourned.