P - Present
E - Excused
A - Absent
Roll Call
P Buckingham
P Dykstra
P Garnos
P Glover
P Hackl
P Hills
P Lange
P Novstrup
P Olson (Ryan)
P Turbiville
E Valandra
P Van Etten
P Weems
P Koistinen, Vice-Chair
P Wick, Chair
OTHERS PRESENT: See Original Minutes
The meeting was called to order by Chair Wick
MOTION:
TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 10, 2005
Moved by: Dykstra
Second by: Weems
Action: Prevailed by voice vote.
HB 1236: limit the annual increase of property taxes that may be levied for the
capital outlay fund of school districts.
Testimony given on HB 1236 at the February 8, 2005 meeting.
"
Section 1. That chapter
13-16
be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as
follows:
Moved by: Dykstra
Second by: Weems
Action: Failed by voice vote.
MOTION:
DEFER HB 1236 TO THE 41ST LEGISLATIVE DAY
Moved by: Dykstra
Second by: Van Etten
Action: Prevailed by roll call vote.(13-0-2-0)
Voting Yes: Buckingham, Dykstra, Garnos, Glover, Hackl, Hills, Lange, Novstrup, Turbiville,
Van Etten, Weems, Koistinen, Wick
Excused: Olson (Ryan), Valandra
HB 1180: revise certain provisions concerning business improvement districts and
to exempt general occupational tax receipts from the sales and gross receipts taxes.
Presented by: Representative Donna Schafer
Proponents: Harry Christianson, Convention Visitors Bureau
George Valentine, SD Innkeepers Assn.
Lorin Pankratz, Visitor Industry Alliance
David Owen, SD Chamber of Commerce & Industry
Yvonne Taylor, SD Municipal League
Patrick McElgunn Jr., Rapid City Area Of Chamber Of Commerce
Moved by: Van Etten
Second by: Weems
Action: Prevailed by voice vote.
MOTION:
DO PASS HB 1180 AS AMENDED
Moved by: Turbiville
Second by: Van Etten
Action: Prevailed by roll call vote.(14-0-1-0)
Voting Yes: Buckingham, Dykstra, Garnos, Glover, Hackl, Hills, Lange, Novstrup, Olson (Ryan),
Turbiville, Van Etten, Weems, Koistinen, Wick
Excused: Valandra
MOTION:
PLACE HB 1180 ON CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by: Turbiville
Second by: Van Etten
Action: Prevailed by voice vote.
HB 1141: revise certain provisions on how real property sales are used to assess real
property and to lower the general fund levies of school districts.
Presented by: Representative Al Koistinen
"
Section 1. That
§
10-6-74
be amended to read as follows:
10-6-74.
Any real property which sells for more than one hundred
fifty
sixty
percent of its
assessed value, may not be used for the purpose of valuing other real property. The sale of any real
property which is not used for the purpose of valuing other real property pursuant to this section may
not be used in any sales ratio study.
Section 2. For taxes payable in 2007, the levy for the general fund of a school district, as
provided in
§
10-12-42, shall be lowered by:
Section 3. That
§
10-6-74
be amended to read as follows:
10-6-74.
Any real property which sells for more than
one hundred fifty
one hundred seventy-five
percent of its assessed value, may not be used for the purpose of valuing other real property. The sale
of any real property which is not used for the purpose of valuing other real property pursuant to this
section may not be used in any sales ratio study.
Section 4. That
§
10-6-74
be amended to read as follows:
10-6-74.
Any real property which sells for more than
one hundred fifty
one hundred ninety
percent of its assessed value, may not be used for the purpose of valuing other real property. The sale
of any real property which is not used for the purpose of valuing other real property pursuant to this
section may not be used in any sales ratio study.
Section 5. That
§
10-6-74
be amended to read as follows:
10-6-74.
Any real property which sells for more than
one hundred fifty
two hundred ten
percent
of its assessed value, may not be used for the purpose of valuing other real property. The sale of any
real property which is not used for the purpose of valuing other real property pursuant to this section
may not be used in any sales ratio study.
Section 6. That
§
10-6-74
be repealed.
10-6-74.
Any real property which sells for more than one hundred fifty percent of its assessed
value, may not be used for the purpose of valuing other real property. The sale of any real property
which is not used for the purpose of valuing other real property pursuant to this section may not be
used in any sales ratio study.
Section 7. Section 3 of this Act is effective on July 1, 2007.
Section 8. Section 4 of this Act is effective on July 1, 2009.
Section 9. Section 5 of this Act is effective on July 1, 2011.
Section 10. Section 6 of this Act is effective on July 1, 2012."
Moved by: Weems
Second by: Buckingham
Action: Prevailed by roll call vote.(8-6-1-0)
Voting Yes: Buckingham, Dykstra, Novstrup, Olson (Ryan), Van Etten, Weems, Koistinen, Wick
Voting No: Garnos, Glover, Hackl, Hills, Lange, Turbiville
Excused: Valandra
SB 2: revise the procedure for assessing certain agricultural property.
Proponents: Roger Lee, Kingsbury Asessment Task Force
Faye Dubbelde, Turner County, Parker, SD
The Chair deferred SB 2 until Thursday, February 17, 2005.
The Chair deferred SB 78 until Thursday, February 17, 2005.
MOTION:
ADJOURN
Moved by: Turbiville
Second by: Hills
Action: Prevailed by voice vote.
Diane Mellan