80th Legislative Session _ 2005

Committee: Joint Appropriations
Monday, January 24, 2005

                                            P - Present
                                            E - Excused
                                            A - Absent

Roll Call
    Apa, Chair
    Bartling
    Dennert
    Earley, Vice-Chair
    Gant
    Glenski
    Greenfield
    Hanson (Gary)
    Haverly
    Hunhoff
    Klaudt, Vice-Chair
    Napoli
    Peters
    Rausch
    Smidt
    Sutton (Duane)
    Tidemann
    Putnam, Chair

OTHERS PRESENT: See Original Minutes

The meeting was called to order by Representative J.E. "Jim" Putnam

Board of Regents

Members of the Board of Regents attending the hearing include the following:
Harvey Jewett, President of the South Dakota Board Regents, Randy Morris, Vice President of the South Dakota Board Regents, Jim O. Hanson, Chair of the Regents Budget and Finance Committee, Tad Perry, Executive Director of the Board of Regents, Pat Labrun, Board of Regents member, Tony Vanheissan, Student Regent from Brookings, Terry Baloun, Board of Regents member, Richard Belatti, Board of Regents member, Carole Pagones, Board of Regents member

Documents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 were distributed throughout the course of January 24 and January 25, 2005.
    
This is the seventh straight year of increasing enrollment figures through out the higher education system. The number of students have increased to approximately 29,000 at current count.

Seventy-five percent of students are residents of South Dakota. Fifty-six percent the of students are female and forty-four percent are male. Seventy-five percent of the students are between 18 and 25 years of age. There have been 181 transfers from technical schools to state universities.

The Board of Regents is currently working out an arrangement with the Vocational Technical schools to assist students who are in transition from a Tech school to a university. The Watertown Area Vocational Technical Institute has entered into an agreement to teach general level courses by BOR qualified instructors. This will enable Tech students to transfer the general level courses to a four-year university. The Board is also working with other Technical Institutions on like arrangements.

The retention rate of freshmen is approximately seventy percent. These students were enrolled in the fall of 2003 and were enrolled in the same university in the fall of 2004.

An exam is given to each junior after 70 credit hours are earned, and South Dakota students finish above the national norm. On a national scale, South Dakota is the fourth lowest for tuition and fees. For total cost, South Dakota is the lowest public education provider in the surrounding states. South Dakota averages about $6,600 a year, per student, in student aid. The status of our faculty continues to be good. Seventy-seven percent of the courses have instructors with terminal degrees, meaning they have the highest degree available in their field. Only two percent of faculty do not have at least masters degrees. The student/facility ratio changed since 1999 when it was 16.7 students to each faculty member. Now it is approximately 18 students to each faculty member.

Federal and other fund grants have increased about 124% since 2000. $60.5 million came to South Dakota's universities in grants last year and only $1.6 million were in state grants. Of the FY2006 increase, only 15.5 FTE are state funded. Eighty-two percent of the money that has been appropriated since 1999 is salary policy alone.

There have been three studies conduced on South Dakota higher education graduates and they all show that if a South Dakota resident attends an in-state post-secondary school, eighty percent of those will stay in-state. Even forty percent of the out-of-state students who attend South Dakota schools stay here after graduation. It is very important to our state to get our kids to attend our universities.


The Board was involved in a lawsuit regarding Title IX facilities, which require equity in athletic opportunities for both males and females. The Board originally requested $1.2 million in their FY2006 budget to help upgrade facilities at the universities to include more females. The Governor did not recommend the request. The Regents will introduce separate legislation to fund this request.

The Lee Building at the USD Medical School is a unique case. Between the university's HEFF funds, and grants from hospitals, $3.2 million was raised for the science building. The University cut $2 million from the project to help make ends meet. The $2 million would have been used for furnishings. Even with the cut, they were still $1.8 million short for the building. The decision was then made to assess the medical students an additional $1,000/year and the non-medical $500/year to pay for the science building.

Representative Glenski asked if the HEFF funds could be used, but the Regents replied that the maintenance and repair funds are stretched to the limits right now. There is currently in excess of $100 million in repairs that await funding.

We expect to add six Ph.D. programs this year, all directed to research. Three are included in the FY06 budget and three were approved at the December meeting of the Board and require no additional funding. There are currently a total of fourteen Ph.D. programs in the state. The focus is to expand Ph.D. programs in areas that are most likely to receive grants. The Regents will monitor the declining enrollment in the state and duplication.

With the agreements between the Board and the Technical Schools, it finally puts to rest issues of mission creep and general course duplication. The state will save money over through this process. If more technical institutes are added to the agreement, more money will be needed for the Board of Regents to provide the qualified instructors.

Representative Glenski asked what the criteria is for teachers of technical classes? Mr. Hanson answered that the instructor has to have at least 18 graduate hours or a major in that area. It is the same criteria that is currently in place. Representative Glenski followed up with another question of how many teachers in the Sioux Falls Technical school did not meet the criteria? The response was that it is a moving number, so it needs to be looked at every semester, the answer is unavailable.

Representative Haverly asked Mr. Hanson why there were different numbers of FTEs requested by the Board and recommended by the Governor for the Ph.D. programs. At the time the request was submitted, updating had not occurred. They prepared the budget back in September and more accurate estimates became available when the Governor put his budget together.

Senator Earley asked about the original request for an increase in the utilities budget. The Board had requested $2.7 million, but the Governor recommended only $647,329. Senator Earley wanted to know how difference will be paid for? Mr. Jewett replied that the Board requested it as more of a policy statement than really thinking they would receive the funding. Since the $2 million was a catchup for utilities, what would have been the plan for that if it had been appropriated to the Regents? It would have gone towards other areas such as the library and updating technology, which are the two most underfunded areas of a university.

Representative Klaudt asked what the total utility bill was for last year? The answer was that it was $4.6 million for FY04. Monty Kramer said that all utilities are not under contract, as Representative Klaudt's report from Legislative Audit indicated. Mr. Kramer will work with Legislative Audit to reconcile the utilities budget with the actual expenditures.

Representative Haverly voiced hi concern that the federal money will dry up after we have successful programs up and running. The Board acknowledged the concern, and said that this happens frequently, but the state benefits through knowledge and equipment gained through the grant. The FTE is no longer used for that project and is simply reassigned to another grant project or is let go. The best outcome is to get the grant projects to be self-funded by the time the federal money runs out.

Senator Schmidt asked about the General fund one-time funding request for library resources that was not recommended by the Governor. With the Ph.D. programs in place, an electronic library is an important aspect of the support tools needed for successful programs. A special appropriations bill will not be introduced for library upgrades.

Senator Earley had a concern with the Ag Experiment Station which is asking for more money. He wanted to know why they are spending $9 million in general funds, and wondered if there was a creep from federal research into the general fund. Mr. Jewett replied that part of the reason general funds are spent on research in that budget was due to the requirements of being a land grant university.

Representative Haverly asked how we would see the result of the product of research and where it would appear in the budget. The Board was requested to break out Royalty Revenues in their list of revenues published in the Governor's budget book every year.

Representative Haverly asked when the Office of Research would be broken out in their budget book. Dr. Perry said that it currently is, however, not at a level that appears in the Governor's Budget book. The committee would like to see that program broken out in a separate line item in future years.

The committee recessed at 10:15 A.M.
The committee reconvened at 10:40 A.M.

System Overview, presented by Dr. Perry


Until seven years ago, the budget was based on a student enrollment formula. It was then frozen and considered a base-line budget. From that point on, the Board has requested increases to that budget. That was done for two reasons: 1) They needed to maintain the value of the base budget; and 2) The policy needed to be broader than student enrollment.

The Board established four goals that will guide them over the next several years:
    Policy Goal #1: Access: every qualified South Dakotan shall have access to public postsecondary education;

    Policy Goal #2: Academic Quality and Performance: South Dakota public universities and special schools shall provide a quality educational experience;

    Policy Goal #3: State Wealth: South Dakota public universities shall engage in activities designed to enhance the state's long-term economy; and

    Policy Goal #4: Efficiency: South Dakota public universities and special schools shall continue to seek means for improving efficiency in the delivery of educational services.

The recommended FTE increase for FY06 is 222.5. The largest portion 205.0 are funded with federal and other funds through contracts and grants. 15.5 FTE are the only state funded FTE included in this request. Two FTEs are requested for the West River Consortium, which is an added activity and service in the Black Hills region. It will add students to the current population.

Representative Rausch asked if the West River Consortium is temporary? The Regents responded that they will review the results and determine it's future depending on them.

Mike Derby, chairman of the Black Hills Vision and Mark Merchant, Vice President of Black hills vision spoke to the committee in support of the Board of Regent's funding requests. They are extremely supportive of the research portion and the addition of the Ph.D. programs.

The budget for Northern State University, presented by Dr. Patrick Schloss, President of Northern State University (NSU) and Dr. Erika Tallman, Director of the E-Learning Center.

The major challenge at NSU is decreased population base and decreased enrollment. The new president is up to the challenge of attracting new students and retaining the freshmen and sophomores who are at risk of dropping out. how and what we do to attract students at Northern.

Dr. Tallman, Director of the E-Learning Center, described the center as having four pieces: 1) high school service to K-12; 2) enhancement to teacher education program; 3) technology enhancement to all majors; and 4) graduate program in e-learning. Every day there are 36 classes delivered to K-12 students. They have grown every year since it's inception. The goal of the center is to make educational opportunities equal throughout the state, regardless of the rural status.

Senator Earley asked if there was a charge to the students. Dr. Tallman said that the districts are required to supply the students with the same text book as the instructor uses, and some courses that require lab instruction require the district to "check-out" a lab kit. If the lab kit is returned in good condition, the student, nor the district, is charged any thing for it's use. There should also be an e- mentor in the classroom at all times.

Representative Haverly wanted to clarify the fact that there is no tuition. Dr. Tallman said that was correct, outside of the expense of textbooks.

There were two reasons not to charge a fee for the E-Learning courses: attracting teachers, and attracting students. Representative Peters asked if this program is funded through general funds. Dr. Tallman said that it is funded through general funds from the appropriations committee, in addition to some federal and private funded grants that are written for equipment.

Representative Dennert wanted to know if private schools can have access to E-Learning. Dr. Tallman responded that these schools can access the courses, but would have to pay the hourly fee.

The Committee recessed at 12:04
The Committee reconvene at 8:00 a.m. on January 25, 2005.                                    

The budget for the South Dakota School For the Blind, presented by Superintendent Margorie Kaiser.

The school provides statewide services to children with vision problems. What they get for service depends totally on what the parents and the school decide.
The FY2006 budget request consists of increase for utilities. Representative Dennert asked for the amount of the utility bills. Ms. Kaiser said that is about $52,000.

The budget for Dakota State University (DSU), presented by Douglas Knowlton, President.

DSU went from being number four to number two in a national survey of technical universities. The student enrollment is currently at 2,295 with 854 of them in undergraduate courses and 148 of them enrolled in graduate information technology courses. There were 289 graduates in the spring of 2004. The university currently offers three masters programs. After graduation, 92% of the students are employed in their field and 85% of them stay in-state.

The FY2006 budget issues are utility increases and retaining the salary policy. The campus will be 125 years old this year and cannot use M&R funds to pay for utilities. The old buildings must be maintained. The salary policy is key in helping instructors with a master degrees to get their Ph.D.



Representative Putnam asked about the partnerships with private industry. Many private sectors do come and ask for help with forensic technology, and the university will be focusing on it in the future.

Representative Hunhoff wanted to know if the three masters programs that are available at DSU are offered at other universities in South Dakota. The answer was that one of the three is available at Black Hills State University, but the other two are unique to DSU.

Representative Tidemann asked about distance education and the cost per student? The university responded that those classes are self supported, and it is hard to calculate the actual cost. Of the distance education students, what is the break down of those that are enrolled via distance, and those that are enrolled via DDN? 1640 is the total enrollment and 912 were enrolled via distance education and 728 were enrolled via DDN.

President Peggy Miller presented the South Dakota State University budget request. SDSU students pay for nearly all the maintenance and repairs, and what they don't pay for is paid by the alumni. There has been a steady increase in the costs of utilities, however the last increase in the utility budget was in the early 1990's. The payments for utilities are being made from the technology and library budgets. This money is desperately needed.

The budget for South Dakota Agriculture Experiment Station, presented by Dr. Kepheart

The station conducts practical research to better agriculture.

Biostress programs at SDSU emphasize development of management strategies to minimize the effects, risks and costs of stress on people, crops, and livestock. The Sun Grant Initiative seeks to revolutionize ag-based energy and biobased industries. AES scientists are making advances in issues of great importance. Examples of significant efforts to include crop and livestock diseases, transgenic crops, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (such as BSE) ethanol coproducts, meat processing, etc. Collaboration with private industry and NGOs is increasing. Some example partners include: Broin Industries, Verasun, Monsanto, Dupont/Pioneer, Hematech, and the SD Ag Value Added Center. The SDSU Rural Life and Census Data Center provides census based information. The center's services and demographic information are valuable tools for state and community leaders struggling with difficult decisions. Both AES and the SD Cooperative Extension Service are leading collaborative programs with neighboring states.

FY2006 Cooperative Extension budget, presented by Dr. Warman

The Extension's role is to take new information to the people. Collaborative efforts are being done with the SD Department of Agriculture and SD Department of Health in the areas of pesticide safety and West Nile Virus containment. The Extension provides wellness education and diabetes prevention education programs; family financial management and money matters; food safety for restaurant cooks and community groups; youth development and 4-H; Science Alive school program; farm financial management; soybean aphid information; weed control; sulfur-deficient corn; feed savings; and grazing tours.

Senator Earley wanted explained to the committee how the new research model is different from the agricultural experiment station model. The answer was that the Governors model is to establish experiment models that will eventually become self-sustaining.

Representative Hunhoff wanted to know about the intellectual properties and if we have a patent on that? A change to this model is a new royalty policy, of which goes to the developer and then to the university.

Representative Tidemann said that in the past, the information gained through research was held and companies could buy into it. How do you maintain the credibility of unbiased research? Whatever is found will be made public. The integrity of the research is unbiased.

The committee recessed at 10:00 A.M.
The committee reconvened at 10:15 A.M.

Black Hills State University's budget, presented by President Thomas Flickema.

The university is spread out over several locations and serve several non-traditional students. The university has had a problem coming into compliance with Title IX - Equity in Athletics. Females account for 64% of the student body and only 36% of athletes are female. 3846 is the number of enrollment.

The federal money that supports the Center of Tourism Research will run out in three to four years and at that point it must be self-sustaining.

Senator Schmidt wanted a follow up on the mobile science lab. Mr. Flickerman replied that the outlook of its continuation is very optimistic.

Representative Glenski wanted to know what the governor based the utility increase on. Tad Perry said that his recommended increase was based on the growth of FY06 projections over FY05 actuals.

Senator Apa wanted to know about the Black Hills Consortium. The School of Mines is handling the infrastructure and Black Hills State is handling the organizational aspects.

South Dakota School of Mines and Technology's (SDSM&T) budget, presented by Charles Ruck, President.

The university offers only engineering and science degrees. The South Dakota Opportunity Scholarship program has made a significant difference in their enrollment. Sixty five of the scholarship recipients are still attending after their freshmen year.

Two of the new Ph.D. programs will be offered at SDSM&T. The programs are in nanoscience and nonoengineering. The nanoscience degree will be the third in the country.

The budget for the South Dakota School for the Deaf (SDSD), presented by Superintendent Maureen Schloss.

The enrollment has a larger auditory oral platform and a smaller American Sigh Language (ASL) population. Before they added the oral platform, SDSD primarily served severe to profoundly deaf students because those children used sign language to communicate. Students with mild and moderate hearing losses tend to have speech and language delays, but historically did not attend the school because these students tend not to use sign language.

The oral platform is designed to allow the student to enter the mainstream after one to four years at SDSD. Rather than serving primarily severe to profound deaf signing students pre-K through 12th grade, many deaf students will receive cochlear implants and stay at SDSD for three or four of their early elementary years. SDSD will also provide services to children with a moderate hearing loss who will be at SDSD for one to four years. Because of this, SDSD's enrollment will probably increase slightly, but SDSD will need to change to serve a younger population of students and a larger oral platform.

Senator Earley asked if deaf people are being mainstreamed in the school systems. Yes they are but teachers are not trained to handle their problems. Our plan is to get these children out to the mainstream by 4th grade.

Representative Hunhoff asked what grade levels were taught at SDSD? Ms. Schlass replied that K- 12 are taught at the school. Representative Hunhoff then asked how many go on to post-secondary, but the school said the numbers are not available.

The budget for the University of South Dakota, presented by President James Abbot

Funded research at USD in 2004 was approximately $26 million. The federal and other research dollars help the university in several ways, especially in equipment purchases, new jobs, economic increase.

USD's fundraising effors have brought in about $65 million. The funds are needed to generate more scholarships.

The majority of the operating budget increase is for federal and other FTE. This is needed to do the research. Research grants and contracts enhance the university's reputation; offer learning opportunities for students; provide professional development opportunities for faculty; are a source of funding for equipment; result in the creation of new jobs; and foster economic development in South Dakota.

Senator Earley asked about USD and USD Medical School numbers as to why the recommendation for FTE are high? The base budget was short by 25 and they brought a request to Interim.

Senator Apa asked about the policy recommendation of raising the entrance requirement of ACT minimum scores from 18 to 21 and if it will have an effect on student enrollment? President Abbot said that in the beginning it may have some effect, but he thinks that they should market to their strength - which is not providing remedial courses.

Senator Gant asked President Abbot how many students were below the 24 on the ACT? Answer is on p.4 of handout. Retention is key with lower ACT scores. There ought to be an institution that specializes in remedial courses and can keep those students from falling behind and dropping out.

Governor is recommending a new Ph.D. program in computational science and statistics at USD.

Acting Dean of the USD Medical School, Rodney Parry, M.D., presented information on the School. They have been recognized by the U.S. News and World Report as having one of the top ten rural medicine programs in the nation. The school has nine health care programs.

The University Physicians downsized from a staff of 120 to 9. It now operates in the black more months than in the red.

The Lee Medical Building is the home for the first two years of the medical program located in Vermillion. It is a very old building and is desperate need of the remodeling being done. There is a $1.8 million dollar shortfall in the remodeling budget, therefor a $1,000 per student fee was assessed.

Representative Putnam asked Dr. Parry about family practice and physicians and if the school still made those degrees available. Dr. Parry said they are still very committed to that mission.

MOTION:     ADJOURN

Moved by:    Peters
Second by:    Smidt
Action:    Prevailed by voice vote.



Wendy Weinert

____________________________

Committee Secretary
J.E. "Jim" Putnam, Chair


../01240800.JAP
Page 1